Briefings

A festival of community ownership

July 17, 2019

<p>Not so very long ago, any reference to Scotland&rsquo;s community land movement was a direct reference to the North West Highlands and Islands. But gradually that perception has shifted to the point where community land ownership has either become a reality or at least a realistic aspiration, for communities the length and breadth of the country. Next month sees the second Community Land Week - a <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://www.communitylandscotland.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Community-Land-Week-2019-programme.pdf">programme </a></span>of 45 events celebrating and exploring the diversity of Scotland&rsquo;s community land movement.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Community Land Scotland

Community Land Week is back – bigger and better than ever! This year, almost 50 events will be running across Scotland, from the 10th to the 18th August. You can see the events listed by area below, find them on the map or download a programme from here.

Briefings

Community house builders

<p>The reason volume housebuilders aren&rsquo;t able to respond to the housing crisis in rural Scotland is that their business model is to build houses in large numbers all in the same place. Which is why a different model is required - one that can respond to scattered housing demand and requires small numbers of houses to be built in lots of different places. If communities are to become the defacto housing developer, they&rsquo;ll need plenty of specialist support to hold their hands throughout the complex and lengthy process.&nbsp; But when that is done well, the results can be spectacular.</p>

 

Author: Scottish Housing News

Building work has started on three three family-sized passivhaus certified homes in the village of Closeburn in Dumfries and Galloway. These homes, in the ownership of the local Development Trust – Nith Valley Leaf Trust (NVLT) – will be the first community-owned Passivhaus certified homes in Scotland. 

 

NVLT have worked with the support of Dumfries and Galloway Small Communities Housing Trust (DGSCHT) throughout the project.  The homes will provide energy-efficient accommodation to families with a connection to the local community – an identified local need that will support services in Closeburn, including the school. 

 

The community-led homes are being primarily funded by The Scottish Government’s Rural Housing Fund and the Scottish Land Funds, as well as a loan from the Ecology Building Society.

 

The project, which has been three years in development, has been designed by John Gilbert Architects and is being built by the contractor Stewart & Shields from Helensburgh who specialise in the delivery of passive buildings.  The delivery team are engaging local contractors and liaising with the local community wherever possible, including Closeburn Primary School.

 

NVLT took the ambitious decision to deliver homes with Passivhaus certification relative to locally identified issues and in order to reduce long-term impact on the environment, whilst tackling fuel poverty. The project team hope to encourage other Community Trusts to follow principles of Passivhaus design because of the obvious benefits for tenants, including low heating bills, higher air quality and healthier homes.

 

The UK Passivhaus Trust has confirmed that – to the best of their knowledge – this project will provide the first community-owned Passivhaus accredited housing in Scotland – a proud achievement for the NVLT and DGSCHT.

 

The homes are due for completion by December 2019, at which point the NVLT will hold an opening ceremony and allow the community to view the finished homes.  Over the summer, a register of interest will open for prospective tenants.

 

Mike Staples, Chief Executive of DGSCHT said,

 

“After a huge amount hard work and dedication across the whole project team, it’s amazing to see the project on-site.  The group have been clear in their objectives to support a shortfall in affordable accommodation for families and to address fuel poverty and it’s this determination that has retained the focus on attaining passive certification.  We’re really excited to see community-led passihvaus come to fruition in Dumfries and Galloway and can’t wait to see tenants move in later this year”.

 

Mike Steele, Director of NVLT said, ‘We are very keen to keep our young families in Closeburn by providing affordable community owned and managed state-of-the-art energy-efficient homes.  We think this is one big step towards achieving this aim.  NVLT is a community run trust that’s now delivering projects like these modern homes for rent that the community wants and needs”.

Briefings

Post-Brexit protections

<p>Under EU law, we can all approach the European Commission, at no cost to ourselves, to complain about a government department or agency if we think they are failing to uphold EU laws on environmental protections. This is a vital safeguard and has been used to great effect on a number of occasions in Scotland. All of that may disappear on 1st November, and pressure is being applied on Scottish Ministers to bring forward new legislation to ensure these protections are replaced. SCA, with many others, has signed a <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #1155cc;" data-mce-mark="1"><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/26/climate-crisis-tree-planting-and-new-left-economics"><span style="color: #1155cc;" data-mce-mark="1">letter </span></a></span></span>to the First Minister calling for action.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Severin Carrell, Guardian

Environment campaigners have warned that Scotland will lose vital legal safeguards because ministers have failed to ensure environment and pollution laws will be properly enforced after Brexit. 

They said ministers in Edinburgh had refused repeated requests to table new legislation to guarantee citizens and campaigners in Scotland the same rights they now had under European law.

WWF Scotland, the conservation group, said this meant it would be much harder – if the UK left the EU – for campaigners to legally challenge the Scottish government for failing to uphold air quality standards, or to stop wildlife being culled by Scottish Natural Heritage, a government agency, before other dispersal methods were tried. 

In an open letter published by the Guardian, many of Scotland’s leading conservation and civic groups have urged Nicola Sturgeon, the first minister, to introduce an environment act guaranteeing that legal rights available within the EU continue after Brexit.

The letter, signed by 16 bodies including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, WWF, Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, National Trust for Scotland and Royal Scottish Geographic Society, said the climate emergency added to the need for legislation.

Organised by the umbrella group Scottish Environment Link, the letter says: “Nicola Sturgeon has acknowledged that our planet faces a climate emergency. Inextricably linked to this is growing ecological crisis. 

“We must not let Brexit derail us from tackling these huge global challenges head on. Whatever the outcome of the current political uncertainties we need robust, binding, targets for the recovery of Scotland’s natural environment, to safeguard both nature and people.”

Its signatories want the new act to create an independent regulator to police government and public agency decisions, and enforce environmental laws to at least the same standard as the EU’s. They also want principles of environmental law used by the EU enshrined in Scots law, and binding targets set to improve and protect the environment.

Under EU law any citizen can go, for free, to the European commission to challenge a government’s or agency’s failure to uphold EU law. The commission can investigate and take enforcement action, including taking the member state to the European court of justice.

Those powers have been used at EU level by the legal group Client Earth to make the UK enforce air pollution regulations; by the RSPB to halt a cull of barnacle geese on Islay, sanctioned by Scottish Natural Heritage; and again by the RSPB, to protect peatlands in England. 

Michael Gove, the UK environment secretary, is planning to introduce similar procedures after Brexit to cover environmental legal enforcement in England. The Labour-run Welsh government, which like Holyrood has devolved responsibilities for the environment, is involved in that process. 

Although the UK, Scottish and Welsh governments have cooperated closely on measures to transpose EU environment regulation into UK and Scots law, ministers in Edinburgh have refused to cooperate with Gove’s plans for new regulatory measures. So the Scottish government’s own expert advisory panel and the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Scotland’s national academy, have urged ministers to set up the independent regulator, as sought by the letter’s signatories.

Roseanna Cunningham, the Scottish environment secretary, responded to the letter by insisting her government was committed to matching or exceeding the EU’s environment laws, but she refused to confirm it would introduce a new environment act or oversight agency. 

She said: “While our choice would be to remain fully within EU governance systems our approach will ensure we remain true to the EU environmental principles and ensure governance that fit Scottish needs, circumstances and ambitions. I welcome the continuing involvement of environmental NGOs and civil society in Scotland in this work.”

Lang Banks, the director of WWF Scotland, said: “Citizens have a right to raise concerns but we now risk losing the ability to freely access environmental justice. We are in a climate emergency, we’re in the midst of a biodiversity crisis, and this is the point where we need to be ramping up our environmental protections. Brexit means we risk losing the protections we currently have, when we need them most.”

Briefings

Compassionate communities

July 3, 2019

<p class="MsoNormal">If the crisis facing social care in this country is ever going to be met, most people recognise that the solution rests with finding a way to meld the formal health and social care provision with the informal resources that lie within every community. Some interesting and ground-breaking work taking place in Inverclyde where local people are offering two different services based on the simple premise that we all have capacity to show compassion towards our fellow citizens. One service aims to support folk at the end of life and the other, to support patients on dicharge from hospital.</p>

 

Author: Ardgowan Hospice

A Deeper Dive – an evaluation of Compassionate Inverclyde 

Compassionate Inverclyde is fundamentally about ordinary people doing ordinary things for ordinary people to enhance the wellbeing of all local people and for the community as a whole. It is driven by the intrinsic values of the community, with actions based on community strengths and indigenous ways of thriving. Volunteers and local community groups have chosen the ways in which they wish their informal resources to benefit the community.

 

Compassionate Inverclyde has evolved in the context of measuring outcomes that matter. Therefore, although it has captured some information on inputs, activities and outputs, the relentless focus has been on capturing and sharing images and stories of positive outcomes in a language that resonates with local people.

Much of the information is gathered by volunteers using social media. Highlights are reported to the Board members to provide confidence that the strategic objectives are being progressed. Reporting has been light touch and agile and the process itself has helped to create connections and social capital. Reporting has affirmed the countless contributions of local people but has not attempted to attribute direct impact or estimate cost effectiveness.

 

 Efforts to estimate social return on investment (SROI) attempt to produce a monetary value for the tangible and intangible results from investment in social programmes. This monetary value can then be compared to the resources required to set up and run specific programmes to ensure investments are made, to the correct extent, in the right programmes. A recent review of hundreds of projects in over 40 countries by Prosocial Valuation and Performance Research1 identified the qualities which most influenced the projects’ eventual value. These qualities are:

1. Audacity – envisioning big and bold solutions 

2. Connectivity – deeply engaging with the community being served

 

3. Capacity – using data to understand and improve

4. Ingenuity – disrupting entrenched approaches

5. Tenacity – leveraging the time, relationships, resources required to persevere

6. Diversity – generating revenue and support from multiple sources.

Although Compassionate Inverclyde is still in its early stages, the data gathered through the evaluation process to date highlights that it has many strengths in areas which will lead to a positive SROI. It is clearly following a path which is likely to influence social value. Over time, it may be possible to set the impact of Compassionate Inverclyde against the investment. However, this is difficult because outcomes, by their very nature, tend to be long term and many are not easily pinned down or measurable; and even if they are measureable, it may not be possible to agree and place an appropriate financial value on them. It is clear that dozens of great outcomes are being experienced by hundreds (and in a smaller way thousands) of people of all ages.

 

Briefings

People-powered objections

<p class="MsoNormal">Communities at the south end of Loch Lomond claim they are fighting the most unpopular planning application in Scottish history - and with 56,000 registered objections it seems a reasonable claim to make. And with Scottish Enterprise apparently paving the way for the &pound;30m commercial development by absorbing a significant loss to the public purse on the acquisition costs of the land, the community have good reason to be concerned &ndash; even with West Dunbartonshire Council&rsquo;s recent unanimous rejection of the application.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Local planning democracy being swept aside by commercial expediency? Surely not.</p>

 

Author: Martin Williams , The Herald

Objectors fighting plans to block a controversial £30m development at Loch Lomond say they will stage a campaign of civil disobedience in a bid to prevent it from going ahead.

The warning comes as The Save Loch Lomond campaign group unveiled moves to begin crowd-funding for a legal challenge in an attempt to block the proposed Flamingo Land holiday resort.

The move was announced by Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer as more 250 people packed Alexandria Parish Church in a two-hour meeting to discuss the project, renamed Lomond Banks which is being considered by the Loch Lomond and the National Park Authority.

The development, a joint venture between Scottish Enterprise and Yorkshire-based Flamingo Land features a water park, 60-bedroom apart-hotel, a craft brewery, boat house, leisure centre and restaurants.

The development came as West Dumbartonshire councillors were today expected to consider what response to make to the project as a consultee.

Officers have suggested a response that says the resort would be “real boost” to the local economy but could exacerbate traffic problems.

The public meeting last night began with a request from the chairman, Rory MacLeod of Save Loch Lomond to remember that they were in a “house of God, so moderate your language”.

He said the national park authority intimated felt it was “inappropriate” to attend the meeting while it was a live planning application.

And he said he was “amazed at the numbers” attending, which he claimed amounted to 267 people.

The potential judicial review was raised after one resident asked if legal action could be taken to prevent the project from happening.

Mr Greer, who launched a protest petition signed by 56,225 people, said he and Labour MSP for Dumbarton Jacquie Baillie wanted the Scottish Government to intervene before the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park make a final decision.

But the West of Scotland MSP said that a judicial review, which he described as a legal challenge to the process costs £100,000 describing the process as “cripplingly expensive.”

After one resident suggested that it be crowdfunded, Mr Greer asked if people would support that.

After a loud shout of “yes”, Mr Greer, who had earlier described the proposed development as the “most unpopular planning application in Scottish history” added: “On behalf of the campaign, I am more than happy to commit.

“Save Loch Lomond will launch a crowd-funder for the next stage if required,” said Mr Greer who said he believed a judicial review was an option. “We will go all the way.”

Earlier there was applause for Jim Bollan, a Community Party councillor on West Dunbartonshire Council who suggested that civil disobedience was also an option if the authorities do not listen to the public

“It will destroy the southernmost tip of Loch Lomond.

“When you live in a so-called democracy and the establishment don’t listen to you, it is a well-known principle that you are allowed to be involved in civil disobedience,” he said

“Not only civil disobedience but you are allowed to get involved in non-violent direct action to state your case.  We need to bear that in mind and hope it doesn’t come to that and we win the argument.

Ms Baillie raised concerns about Scottish Enterprise potentially selling the 20-hectare site at West Riverside, Balloch, for the development for £200,000 when it was previously purchased for £2m.

“It is ridiculous that you the taxpayers are paying for a development that you potentially don’t want,” she said.

“I asked whether the Scottish Government would call it in, because I have more faith in the Scottish Government than to leave it locally because it is such a significant application.”

In answer to a resident who questioned why the land could be sold so cheaply, she said: “Ideally I would have wanted them to stop the sale of that land, particularly at a bargain basement price.”

One resident, Sid Perrie, a 55-year-old musician, got up and faced the crowd and said: “I have been driven to despair. My health has suffered for trying to fight this.

It is a disaster. It is the worst thing to happen to this area.

“We need to take this on Wednesday to the council offices to let them know how we feel.”

Another resident said: “We have to unite as a community to oppose this because what we are doing if we do not is killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

“It is not just precious to us locally, it is precious to the whole of Scotland and this world.

“There are no words can come out to describe the anger I feel and the emotion that other people feel.  This planning application is bonkers and it is driving people like me to despair.”

Maurice Corry, the Conservative MSP for West Scotland, said that it was important to take an alternative plan to the National Park board.

“I am a local lad. I was born and bred in Helensburgh. All my children were born in the Vale of Leven Hospital.  I love Loch Lomond.

“I have run around it and been up Ben Lomond,” he said.

“So, therefore, it means a lot to me and I think it is excellent that we are trying to preserve the goodness and greatness of Loch Lomond.” 

 

Briefings

Trust in citizens

<p class="MsoNormal">It can be no coincidence that as the crisis of confidence in elected politicians deepens around the world, the more enlightened democracies are searching for ways to rebuild trust with citizens, and indeed to engage them more directly in thinking about some of the most controversial and contested issues facing society. Although disappointing that Scottish Government&rsquo;s proposal for a citizens&rsquo; assembly for Scotland has been met with scepticism in some quarters, this is nonetheless a hugely ambitious project. Recently a delegation from Ireland visited to share their experiences. Plans are progressing apace.</p>

 

Author: Scottish Government

Here’s what we know about the assembly after the Scottish government gave more details at Holyrood last month.

Why is it being set up?

Nicola Sturgeon says she wants ordinary people from all sides in the constitutional debate to have a say on the country’s future.

The Citizens’ Assembly was first announced by Ms Sturgeon in April – but the plan was largely overshadowed at the time by the first minister also saying she wants another independence referendum within the next two years. 

The basic idea is for members of the public to be selected, much like a jury, to listen to evidence from all sides in Scotland’s constitutional debate, including topics such as independence and Brexit. 

They will be able to question experts and other witnesses and discuss things among themselves before making non-binding recommendations on the country’s future.

The hope is that this “direct democracy” will help to restore people’s trust in the political process by involving ordinary people rather than politicians, parties and other vested interests.

Ms Sturgeon said she was inspired by an assembly set up in Ireland to discuss and attempt to reach consensus on a series of divisive issues, most notably abortion.

 

Her announcement was widely seen as an attempt to reach out beyond the pro-independence movement, with Ms Sturgeon insisting that she wants everyone in Scotland – regardless of their views on independence – to have a say 

But critics are suspicious about Ms Sturgeon’s motives, with the Scottish Conservatives branding it an “SNP vanity project” that will be “nothing but a talking shop for independence”.

The Conservatives have already pledged that they will have “nothing to do with it”, and have warned that “anyone in Scotland who believes in the union should give it a wide berth.”

How will it work?

The Scottish citizens’ assembly will be closely modelled on one that has been used in Ireland in recent years.

The plan is for 120 members of the public to be independently appointed to serve on the assembly, with the aim of having members who are “broadly representative of Scotland’s adult population in terms of age, gender, socio-economic class, ethnic group, geography and political attitudes”.

They will be tasked with examining three questions:

What kind of country are we seeking to build?

How can we best overcome the challenges we face, including those arising from Brexit?

What further work should be carried out to give people the detail they need to make informed choices about the future of the country?

The members will be appointed by early September, with the assembly meeting on six weekends by the spring of next year.

Former Labour MEP David Martin has been lined up as one of the two co-conveners who will lead the assembly – with a female appointment to be made shortly to ensure gender balance.

Assembly members will receive a “gift of thanks” of £200 per weekend to recognise their time and contribution, with travel, accommodation and childcare expenses also being met.

What has the Scottish government said about it?

The government’s constitution secretary, Mike Russell, told MSPs on Wednesday that citizens’ assemblies are becoming an “established way for mature democracies to engage with complex and contested issues in an inclusive, informed and respectful basis”.

He added: “When we see on the Brexit issue a complete breakdown in trust between politicians and people, surely it should inspire all of us – no matter our political allegiance – to find new ways to bring politicians and people together to resolved deep seated division”.

Mr Russell stressed that the work of the assembly would be transparent and completely independent from government, and that a panel of politicians from all of the Holyrood parties would be created for the assembly to call on. 

And he said he hoped that serving on the assembly would be seen as a privilege. 

He added: “As far as practicable, we will respect the outcome too. When this first citizens’ assembly for Scotland concludes, the government will ensure that its recommendations contribute to, and are seen to contribute to, positive steps towards a better collective future.”

Who else has tried this?

The Irish citizens’ assembly recommended overturning the country’s abortion ban ahead of last year’s referendum

The Scottish plans have largely been inspired by the citizens’ assembly that was set up in Ireland three years ago to examine and make recommendations on controversial topics including abortion, climate change and the ageing population. 

Its 99 members were chosen by a polling company to be as representative of Irish society as possible, with the assembly meeting on six weekends between October 2016 and April 2018 at a total cost to the government of about £2m. 

Potential member could choose whether they wanted to be involved, although 17 of those who initially agreed to take part did not attend any meetings and a further 11 dropped out later in the process. They were all replaced from a pool of substitutes.

The assembly’s best known contribution was its recommendation that Ireland should overturn its ban on abortion – with the country subsequently voting overwhelmingly to do so in last year’s referendum.

Elsewhere, Citizens’ Assemblies have been used – with mixed success – to discuss electoral reform in Canada and the Netherlands.

Gdansk in Poland has been using citizens’ assemblies to make binding decisions on issues facing the city for the past three years. 

And last week, MPs at Westminster announced plans to establish a citizens’ assembly in the autumn to discuss how the UK should tackle climate change,

Briefings

How good is your place?

<p class="MsoNormal">Whenever a new toolkit, how-to-guide or online resource is launched, there is a predictable burst of initial interest usually followed by a gradual gathering of dust. One tool that seems to be bucking the trend, and indeed already showing signs of longevity, is the Place Standard. Launched almost four years ago, this is a simple means of making an assessment of the quality of a place. Its simplicity may be the key to its success and why it has been applied to a range of different contexts. Some case studies have just been published to demonstrate its applicability to small neighbourhoods.</p>

 

Author: Architecture and Design Scotland

NEIGHBOURHOOD SCALE – Full Report

 

This series of case studies from Architecture and Design Scotland illustrates how the Place Standard tool has been used in a wide variety of ways and at a range of scales for the purpose of informing spatial planning, community planning, design and development.

The practitioners and organisations featured explain their reasons for using the tool, the methods they applied when doing so, their approach to empowering local communities and the impact that this has had. They also share their perceptions of the tool, the knowledge gained in using it, as well any valuable lessons learned and worth sharing with others.

PLACE STANDARD – NEIGHBOURHOOD  SCALE

Some of the more in-depth work and the closest focus on community empowerment in planning is being carried out using the Place Standard at neighbourhood scale. These case studies demonstrate use of the tool in a number of ways and for a range of purposes:

• As part of a design charrette to develop a community-led regeneration brief for East Pollokshields, Glasgow

• In a ‘grassroots’ consultation to guide priorities for a Community Council in Perth & Kinross

• As a framework for a learning workshop to share experiences of regeneration in a GoWell study area of Glasgow

• Embedded in local authority engagement to inform spatial policy for neighbourhoods across Edinburgh. Benefits for the respective communities have been manifold: getting a range of people – including young people and those from ethnic minorities – involved in planning; identifying gaps and prioritising areas for improvement, and using the structure and accessibility of the tool as a mechanism to share learning.

Key learning points identified by A&DS

• Community participants were mostly engaged at this scale by working together in small facilitated groups or by completing a Place Standard compass diagram by hand with one to one support available. The tool was also used online as an alternative way to engage

• In East Pollokshields, it delivered useful ‘hyper-local’ data as respondents’ perceptions of the place varied from street to street

• The simplicity and accessibility of the tool made it particularly suitable for use with young people in schools (in Edinburgh) and youth groups such as Brownies (in Portmoak)

• Its flexibility and adaptability saw the tool used in drop-in sessions and on-street, and also translated into Urdu (in East Pollokshields)

• In the Glasgow GoWell study area, St Andrews Drive, it was applied in a neighbourhood setting but adapted for use outside of the planning process, namely to share learning and challenge perceptions of regeneration

• On a cautionary note, it is clear from both the Portmoak Community Council and City of Edinburgh Council case studies that the tool should not be treated as an end in itself and the ability to follow up is important. Limitations affecting the ability to take actions need to be understood from the outset to avoid the risk of raising expectations that cannot then be met.

Briefings

Localising the Crown Estate

<p class="MsoNormal">The vexed question of who should control what happens on the foreshore and seabed around Scotland&rsquo;s coastline, and in particular who should benefit from that activity, is beginning to find some answers. For obvious reasons, Scotland&rsquo;s island communities have long recognised the potential benefits that could accrue if these powers were devolved locally. With enabling legislation passed by Scottish Parliament in 2016 and 2019, opportunities have started to open up.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>An innovative partnership between Western Isles Council and community land owner Galson Trust has just been struck.</p>

 

Author: Comhairle nan Eilean Siar

Following decades of campaigning by the Comhairle and its partners, control of the Outer Hebrides foreshore and seabed, currently in the hands of The Crown Estate, is set to return to the local community on a pilot basis.

The new Crown Estate (Scotland) Act 2019 makes provision for management of the foreshore and seabed to be devolved to local organisations and, in a joint bid to Crown Estate Scotland, the Comhairle and Galson Estate Trust are seeking these powers on a pilot basis. 

Crown Estate Scotland and Scottish Ministers have awarded the Comhairle / Galson Trust bid ‘Preferred Project Status’ meaning that, subject to the conclusion of negotiation around some detailed points, the Outer Hebrides proposal can move towards implementation in the near future.

Under the proposal, an Outer Hebrides Marine Development Partnership, comprising representatives of all agencies and regulators with an interest in the Hebridean seas, will assess applications for foreshore or seabed leases before making a recommendation to local decision makers – Galson Trust for Renewable Energy developments in the Galson Trust sea area (out to 12nm) and a Committee of Elected Comhairle Members for all other developments across the Hebrides Marine Region (out to 12nm).

Commenting on this development, Comhairle Convener, Norman A Macdonald, said, “The Comhairle and its partners have lobbied vigorously over many years for a greater say in the administration of our islands’ foreshore and seabed.  Historically, these areas have been managed by The Crown Estate with little local involvement in decision making.  This Pilot project allows local people and local experts to decide what is best for the local sea area and, for the first time, there will be a particular focus on securing socioeconomic benefit for the local community from any commercial activity that takes place in the sea around our islands.  Although this Pilot is restricted to managing foreshore and seabed assets, we continue to press the Scottish Ministers on the return of revenues from these leases to the communities hosting the developments and we are making good progress on this.  Through partnership with Galson Trust, the Comhairle is reversing a long history of external control and is empowering our own communities”.

Briefings

A place for the independent

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 7.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Whatever shape local democracy in this country eventually takes, one of the points of contention will be the place that party politics has to play. Some would argue that thecreation of multi-member wards has diluted the impact of tribal differences, with local councillors more likely to collaborate at a ward level. But when councillors enter the council chambers, party loyalty, not to mention the party whip, determines how they vote. In England where town and parish councils have a degree of real power, independent elected members are proving increasingly popular.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span></p>

 

Author: John Harris, The Guardian

How to take over your town: the inside story of a local revolution

They are passionate about their community, know what the issues are – and are sick to death of party politics. Meet the independent groups from Devon to London who are seizing control

A quiet revolution has begun in the Devon town of Buckfastleigh. Its compact high street, functional-looking industrial estate and population of 3,300 suggest a place modestly getting on with business. But, while it may go unnoticed by those whooshing past on the A38, or tourists at nearby Buckfast Abbey, there is something happening in Buckfastleigh.

That something is a radical reinvention of the way that power works at a local level, based on a kind of politics that has nothing to do with the traditional party system. And it is authored not in a Whitehall ministry, but in towns, villages and neighbourhoods – where it is having a real impact on some of the services people most care about.

Pam Barrett is a 50-year-old civil servant who has lived in the town for 12 years and talks with a mixture of breathless passion and fearsome expertise. Her political biography begins with the local outdoor pool and park, for which she managed to bring in about £300,000 of outside funding – including big donations from Sport England. Saving the pool from closure – and upgrading it and the park – may sound like the most local of issues, but it broadens into a story centred on one key subject: 10 years of cuts, and what austerity has done to a town with high levels of what politicians call social exclusion.

“It felt to me as if we had a properly depressed town,” she says. “The carpet factory here had closed, and loads of people had lost their jobs. All our services were cut. Our buses have been hacked right back and the fares are through the roof. And when the district council said it was going to close the pool, the town council’s view was just: ‘Oh gosh – there goes another thing.’

“I was furious that we were left here with nothing. It takes an anger to do what we have done.”

By 2015, Barrett had joined a loosely affiliated group of local people trying to parry the worst of the cuts – but, she says, they repeatedly hit a wall of obstruction and resistance, not least at Buckfastleigh’s town council. “It was almost as if [they were saying]: ‘This is none of your business,’” she says. There were 12 seats on the council, but there had not been an election for at least 20 years. In that year’s local elections, they challenged the incumbents with the Buckfastleigh Independent Group (BIG).

Promising to make the council more open and inclusive, and to concentrate on solving the town’s problems, nine BIG candidates were elected, meaning they gained control of the council. They increased the local council tax precept (the small share of council tax that goes to town and parish councils), so people in the highest council-tax band paid nearly £2 a week. And they built up an impressive list of achievements: a new Citizens Advice bureau on Friday mornings, floodlights for the football pitch, a new “town ranger” (“Kind of an outdoor caretaker,” says Barrett) and a school-holiday activity service for local young people called Hello Summer – all things woven into people’s everyday lives.

To make all this possible, they made huge changes to the way the town council operates. For a start, its activities are chronicled on Facebook. People who are not elected councillors are free to join in with the monthly agenda at council meetings. “For the first time, we are able to say: ‘We have this amount of money and this is where it goes,’” says the councillor Andy Stokes, who is also Buckfastleigh’s mayor.

Barrett also has plans to widen the bounds of what the council can do. Similar new political groupings have materialised in a handful of nearby towns and villages. This, she says, will lead to sharing resources, so that vitally important but expensive services – health and safety provisions or child protection – can be shared. She thinks that would open the way to a model of running everything from youth services to buses.

Buckfastleigh is not alone. This kind of local uprising has started to occur all over the country. At the May local elections in England, one of the most noticeable changes was the huge increase in the number of independent councillors elected to local authorities, whose numbers increased nearly threefold. Tangled up in that is the proliferation of organised groups, such as BIG, that reject traditional party labels and seek control of the lowest tier of government – town and parish councils – where creative possibilities have tended to be lost in a sea of protocol and tradition.

Councils at this very local level may be associated with parks, allotments, bus shelters and litter bins. But, thanks to the Localism Act 2011, they can – in theory, at least – do whatever they like, within the limits of the law.

Many of the people inspired by this growing mood of local assertiveness are looking to one town that stands as the crucible of this new movement: Frome, in Somerset (my adopted home town), where a group called Independents for Frome took power in 2011, kicking out the Tories and Liberal Democrats to take all 17 seats on the town council. The group has since introduced a new town hall, a publicly funded food bank, electric charge points for cars and a vehicle-sharing scheme. The group’s modus operandi was turned into a manual for radically changing communities, written by the council’s one-time leader Peter Macfadyen, and titled Flatpack Democracy. Some 4,500 copies have been distributed; a sequel will be published this year.

Macfadyen reckons there are between 15 and 20 town and parish councils being run along the lines of the Frome model, “with a non-confrontational way of working and a participatory approach to democracy”. They include a large number in the south-west, places in Yorkshire and County Durham, and even New Zealand. Another 20 similar groupings, he says, have taken seats, but are yet to assume local power.

Why does he think the idea is spreading so fast? “Every other system of so-called democracy is now totally dysfunctional and non-representative,” he says. “And with Brexit, and what’s happening in central government, that is bound to have an impact downwards; people thinking: ‘My voice is not being heard in any way.’”

We’re passionate about our environment and we know what the issues are, and how to sort the problems out

Down the road from Buckfastleigh is Dartmouth, a picturesque place on the Dart estuary, which attracts thousands of tourists. But beyond the half-timbered buildings clustered around the harbour is a community laid low by cuts, whose problems are worsened by the fact that Dartmouth is too big to be a village, but not sizeable enough to merit many of its own public services.

In May’s town council elections, 11 of its 16 seats were won by the new Dartmouth Initiative Group (DIG). Its most vocal representative is Dawn Shepherd, who moved there from Wolverhampton 15 years ago. Her journey to public office began when she started the local food bank. “There’s a lot of poverty here,” she says. “And, on top of that, where we are is like an island. We have no jobcentre, so it is £6 each time on the bus. Having to go somewhere else for everything adds to the poverty.”

The new political grouping was mentored by Pam Barrett from Buckfastleigh. “We didn’t understand how the process worked. The only access we had was going to the council meetings and having 15 minutes to put questions to the mayor,” says Shepherd. “Pam told us that we could make a difference; nothing was set in stone. We could run the council.”

While the makeup of the old town council was disproportionately male, 10 of DIG’s candidates were women. This diversity extends to the group’s mixture of party politics. As with all the independents I meet, they insist that orthodox party divides have no relevance to politics at the most local level. “If you look at our 16 candidates, we have got leftwing people and we have got a supporter of the Brexit party,” says another DIG councillor, Ged Yardy. “We have not been elected on the basis of our previous politics. Party politics is not in the room.”

It would be easy to think of the new wave of independently run town and parish councils as something of a non-urban trend – but there is at least one shining exception. Queen’s Park in west London sits on the outer edge of the City of Westminster, and has a population of about 13,000. Almost a decade ago, a group of residents began to work towards making their area the first part of London to have a parish council in 80 years.

Two years later, their idea won a local referendum – and, in 2014, the first elections for its 12 seats were held. Although insiders are quick to point out that starting a council from scratch has hardly been a breeze, the informal grouping of people (none of whom has a party label) now in charge of an annual budget of about £150,000 have an array of achievements to their name. They include funding a youth centre blighted by cuts, bringing a disused park back into use, starting new annual festivals and creating a befriending project to support isolated and lonely older people.

Ray Lancashire, 54, has been a Queen’s Park councillor for just over a year. Since the age of 10, he has lived on the Mozart estate, where any ideas of the city of Westminster being synonymous with wealth and privilege give way to a much more complex reality. His path to holding public office was defined by his work on air pollution, which local surveys have found to be well above legal limits.

Westminster council, he says, tends to understand pollution in terms of “main roads and trunk roads”, rather than “areas that don’t have high traffic, but are still really affected”. (The council says that it focuses air quality monitoring on “roads that we know are pollution hotspots, as this has the biggest knock-on effect”.) Queen’s Park’s grassroots councillors are now doing in-depth pollution studies, blazing a trail for temporary car-free “play streets” and pushing the authorities to take drastic action. “We are at ground level,” he says. “We’re passionate about our environment and we know what the issues are, and how to sort the problems out. And we’re enthusiastic. That’s why our council is important.”

Perhaps the most unlikely example of the new local democracy is in Alderley Edge in Cheshire. The de facto capital of the north-west’s footballer belt – at various times, the home of Posh and Becks, Cristiano Ronaldo and Peter Crouch – is a remarkably affluent place: on the day I visit, the Barnardo’s charity shop is selling a pair of Christian Louboutin shoes for £150, while Marie Curie has an Alexander McQueen dress for £200. Local people regularly complain about super-rich football stars parking on double yellow lines because they think that the fines are chump change. But recently, even here there were rising complaints about the state of the public realm.

These complaints led to the rise of Alderley Edge First, whose tagline is “people before party”. On a hot Tuesday afternoon, I meet three of their prime movers in the local Caffè Nero: Mike Dudley-Jones, Geoff Hall and Rachael Grantham, whose family has run a grocery business here going back five generations. “When you came to Alderley Edge not so long ago,” says Dudley-Jones, “it was shaky at the edges: weeds in the pavement; the whole thing just looked run down. A one-horse town. And there was no one saying: ‘It doesn’t need to be like this.’”

Alderley is traditionally, solidly Tory – its MP is the Tory leadership hopeful Esther McVey. Until 2015, the Conservatives held all nine seats on its parish council, most of which had long been uncontested. But that May, a near miracle happened. Alderley Edge First won every single one. Since then, its councillors have radically upgraded the local park, completed work on the village’s trouble-plagued new health centre, saved allotments the old parish council wanted to turn into a car park, kept the local library open for an extra afternoon every week and made good on their pledge to spruce up the place – self-watering flower installations pepper the main street.

When I mention party politics, all three members bristle. “It’s so irrelevant at this level,” says Grantham. “For me, it’s a realisation that normal people want to make a difference in their areas. There is a real feeling of people saying: ‘We can make a real difference in our patch.’ That is snowballing.”

Four years ago, as well as aiming at control of the parish council, Alderley Edge First also put up a candidate for Cheshire East council, the big local authority until recently run by the Tories, and dogged by allegations of misconduct, some of which are being investigated by the police. Against formidable odds, Craig Browne – who also sits on the parish council – beat the Tories; after being re-elected a month ago, he became Cheshire East’s deputy leader. Something very striking, he says, now lurks among the champagne, expensive shoes and international hotshots: a revived sense of community spirit. “It was always there, but it was latent,” he says. “What we have done is encourage it. If people see councillors who are prepared to get their hands dirty, they think: ‘If they’re doing it, I’ll do it as well.’ That has been the biggest change.”

Briefings

Embedding kindness

<p class="MsoNormal">Kindness, as one aspect of the human condition, is attracting increasing levels of attention from within the policy world. And at first glance, it&rsquo;s not immediately apparent why. It seems a somewhat alien concept to consider alongside the usual suspects of organisational efficiency, professionalism, regulation and accountability. Carnegie UK have been working with a range of folk interested in embedding kindness within their organisation and in particular with North Ayrshire Council to explore the implications across the entire local authority. Turns out kindness could be a game-changer.</p>

 

Author: Zoe Ferguson and Ben Thurman. Carnegie UK

Full report – The Practice of Kindness

In March 2018, the Carnegie UK Trust brought together a Kindness Innovation Network of people and professionals from across Scotland who had an interest in encouraging kindness in their organisations and communities. At the same time, the Trust began working in partnership with North Ayrshire Council to embed kindness as a value throughout the local authority and region.

The two projects were collaborative and this report reflects a wide range of views and activities from hundreds of people across Scotland – some of which are also highlighted in our short film. The Practice of Kindness brings together practical examples of things that can be done to create the conditions for kindness. However, it also highlights the barriers to relationships within organisations, and posits kindness as a radical concept that demands challenging the systems and structures – including risk and regulation, professionalism, and performance management – that currently govern our institutions.