Briefings

Tunnelling between islands 

July 25, 2023

Mention the word ferry and thoughts immediately turn to CalMac’s ageing fleet, cancelled sailings and the damage that has been inflicted on island economies and, in the main, most of this ferry attention has focused on the Hebridean islands.  But ageing fleets also bedevil services in the Northern Isles too, with seven of the eleven ferries operating between Shetland’s islands more than 30 years old. And it is Shetland’s communities that are taking the lead and seeking a solution. With £100k already raised to assess the feasibility of digging tunnels between islands, this is clearly a serious proposition. 

 

Author: Brian Donnelly, The Herald

Island communities have launched a crowdfunding campaign to pay for the first phase of exploration into the building of subsea tunnels to replace ferries.

People on Unst, the UK’s northernmost inhabited island and neighbouring Yell, separated by the Bluemull Sound, want the link to go to Shetland, which is currently a 20-minute ferry journey away.

However, reliability is an issue with seven of the 11 boats serving Shetland now over 30 years old.

A major campaign to explore the potential for subsea tunnels connecting Yell and Unst with the Shetland mainland has now been launched by the Yell and Unst Tunnel Action Groups

The groups, which have already secured more than £100,000 to kickstart the project, are looking to raise additional funds to commission geo-technical investigations as well as socio-economic and environmental impact work relating to the creation of the tunnels between Unst and Yell and between Yell and the Shetland mainland.

They are aiming to raise a further £50,000 by September 12, with almost £1,000 pledged in the first few hours of its launch.

The campaigners said: “Currently all traffic to and from Unst and Yell is significantly hindered by restrictions due to ferry timetabling and suspension. This is a significant burden for businesses in terms of cost and time.

“In addition, it limits mobility of labour, as well as impeding access to services, including emergency medical care, and social opportunities located off the islands.”

Graham Hughson, Yell Tunnel Action Group chairman, said: “This project seeks to lay the foundations for the tunnel infrastructure which, if successful, will breathe new life into the island communities, support economic and social development, and deliver a reliable, sustainable transport system for residents, businesses, and visitors.

“Our first challenge is to demonstrate if this scheme is technically and economically achievable, and we are very grateful to Unst Spaceport and North Yell Development Council, each of whom have committed £50,000 to the project.

“This financial support is a truly positive demonstration of how the islands’ business community view the potential connection of Unst and Yell to the Shetland mainland by subsea tunnels.”

He continued: “Today we are launching the campaign to add to this funding and take the critical first step in realising our vision for unrestricted travel to Yell and Unst.

“By creating this permanent infrastructure, we can help the islands achieve their true potential, fostering economic prosperity, improving the quality of life for islanders, and promoting a sustainable future.”

The groups view the continued reliance on ferry services as becoming increasingly unsustainable and believe that it is a serious financial commitment for businesses operating in the islands.

Unst and Yell tunnel action groups said they are very grateful to Unst Spaceport and North Yell Development Council, each of whom have committed £50,000 to the project. Left to right: Steven Henderson, YTAG; Andrew Nisbet, North Yell Development Council; Alec Priest, UTAG. (Image: YTAG, UTAG)

Alec Priest, Unst Tunnel Action Group chairman, said: “Space is often restricted for both commercial and passenger traffic at peak times, services are subject to suspension for weather, technical issues or crew availability, and running costs, maintenance, and replacement of vessels comes at an increasingly high price to the public purse.

“The proposed subsea tunnels will not only mitigate these challenges but also provide a reliable and efficient transport solution that ensures uninterrupted connectivity, irrespective of weather conditions.

“Additionally, this initiative will, in the long term, significantly reduce carbon emissions, promoting environmental sustainability and preserving the natural beauty of the islands.

“We are appealing to the generosity and foresight of individuals, organisations, and businesses to donate towards the initial phase of geo-technical, socio-economic and environmental investigations.”

 

Briefings

Be radical, Minister

An optimist might be forgiven for thinking that the Scottish Government currently has at its disposal a potent mix of policy and legislative opportunities with which to make a decent fist of tackling all the big social, economic and environmental challenges that face us.  But the naysayers and apologists for the status quo are a powerful force. Peter Peacock, himself a former Government Minister, understands better than most the pressures that the new Land Reform Cab Sec will be under not to pursue anything too radical in the forthcoming Bill. In this paper, he sets out precisely why she should.

 

Author: Peter Peacock

Peter Peacock’s opinion paper sets out a discussion on what he believes is the need for the Scottish Government to be more radical in the forthcoming draft Land Reform Bill. He convincingly sets out a central challenge to all of us: “Is Scotland to finally act or eternally air our shared national grievance that so few own so much land?”

Essential truths in land reform is a paper by Peter Peacock, a former Highland Council Leader, MSP and Cabinet Secretary and our first Policy Director. We published this paper today 26th June 2023 as part of an ongoing series of papers by independent writers, academics and commentators to promote understanding and stimulate debate on issues relevant to the land debate in Scotland.

See full paper – Here

Briefings

Colonial capitalism

Lankelly Chase is a funder that I’ve always had a soft spot for. In the early years of DTAS, they provided small grants to communities, in this case development trusts, to test out their enterprising ideas. With a minimum of fuss to apply, and with a clear expectation that some would inevitably go bottom up, it was a pleasure to work with them. An openness and reflectiveness within the culture of the organisation explains to some extent their recent decision to cease being a funder altogether. Lankelly has concluded that ‘traditional philanthropy is a function of colonial capitalism’. Wow.

 

Author: Robert Armour, TFN

A leading UK foundation has said it will close, citing that traditional philanthropy was dead and is a “function of colonial capitalism.”

Lankelly Chase has assets of £130m and gives some £13m away each year. However, it says it has become part of the problem facing traditional philanthropy and has taken the decision to close itself.

It was the 79th biggest charitable foundation in the UK in 2021, according to the Association of Charitable Foundations, supporting hundreds of charities and community organisations a year.

The 60-year-old foundation said it would spend the next five years giving away its assets to organisations and networks which are doing life-affirming social justice work in communities around the UK.

Trustees were finding it difficult to be fully ethical in the organisation’s mission as it relied on capitalism to grow its investments.

A statement from the board said: “We have recognised the gravity of the interlocking social, climate and economic global crises we are experiencing today. At the same time, we view the traditional philanthropy model as so entangled with colonial capitalism that it inevitably continues the harms of the past into the present.”

It added: “We will relinquish control of our assets, including the endowment and all resources, so that money can flow freely to those doing life-affirming social justice work. We will make space to reimagine how wealth, capital and social justice can co-exist in the service of all life, now and for future generations.”

Lankelly Chase chief executive, Julian Corner, said: “Philanthropy is a function of colonial capitalism, it has been shaped by it, is being driven by it, and yet philosophically it tries to position itself as somehow a cure for the ills of colonial capitalism, and that contradiction needs to stop.”

Lankelly Chase was created from the charitable bequests of entrepreneurs Alfred Allnatt and Ron Diggens, who made millions from north London property development in the middle of the last century.

 

Briefings

UBI as a public health measure

One might hope that if our economy eventually shifts from being GDP obsessed and becomes more focused on wellbeing, the Universal Basic Income, in some shape or other, would find a home. Critics of the concept always claim it is unaffordable and argue that it undermines the very nature of work. But these arguments have never addressed the impact of AI on the labour market nor do they consider the actual savings (as opposed to costs) that a basic income would generate. Revealing research from the NIHR that conceptualises universal basic income as a public health measure. 

 

Author: NIHR

New research funded by the National Institute for Health and Social Care Research (NIHR) has found that a Basic Income scheme could potentially save the NHS tens of billions of pounds.

‘Treating causes not symptoms: Basic Income as a public health measure’ uses a range of economic and health modelling, public opinion surveys and community consultation to present cutting-edge evidence on the impact of Basic Income schemes.

Economic impact: 

  • Even a more ‘modest’ basic income scheme (£75 a week, £3,900 a year) would reduce child poverty to the lowest level since comparable records began in 1961 and achieve more at significantly less cost than the anti-poverty interventions of the New Labour governments. 
  • Child and pensioner poverty down by at least 60% each
  • Working age poverty down by between 29% and 75% depending on the scheme
  • Inequality down 55% to the lowest in the world under the most ambitious scheme

Public health impact: 

  • Between 125,000 and 1 million cases of depressive disorders could be prevented or postponed.
  • Between 120,000 and 1.04 million cases of clinically significant physical health symptoms could be prevented or postponed.
  • Between 130,000 and 655,000 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) could be gained, valued at between £3.9 billion and £19.7 billion.
  • Based on depressive disorders alone, NHS and personal social services cost savings in 2023 of between £125 million and £1.03 billion assuming 50% of cases diagnosed and treated.

Briefings

Beyond the money

July 11, 2023

As Scotland transitions to clean, renewable sources of energy, there remains a stubborn official ambivalence towards the merits of community ownership as part of the overall mix of how this new industry should develop. This is despite research that suggests community owned renewables generate a financial return to the community 34 times greater than that of private wind farms. But community energy is about much more than purely financial returns or even the energy that is generated, and if this was better appreciated, perhaps that official ambivalence would melt away. This piece highlights ten social benefits of community-owned energy.  

 

Author: ÓSCAR GÜELL, RESCoop.EU

The transition to climate neutrality cannot be achieved through technology and markets alone. The participation of citizens and local communities is crucial to making this transition efficient and just, and ensuring that everyone shares its economic, environmental and social benefits. Energy communities are a collaborative model that constitutes the perfect vessel for directly involving citizens and local communities in renewable energy facilities. As energy communities can have a strong social impact, they play an important role in society – beyond clean energy production. Here are ten examples of economic, social and environmental benefits of energy communities!

1. Energy communities provide local and clean energy

Through their projects, energy communities aim first and foremost to guarantee their members access to clean and local energy. By producing their own energy, they also protect their members from price fluctuations in the energy market, which is especially relevant in times of crisis, such as the one we are living in today. For example, last year the energy prices of commercial energy providers in Belgium were consistently more unsteady and expensive than the ones of the Belgian energy cooperative Ecopower.

Moreover, the community energy model highlights the fact that energy is a common good to which everyone should have access. It makes members aware of the right to access, but also of the responsibility to treat energy as a scarce good, which promotes energy savings and energy optimisations.

2. Energy communities mobilise local capital

By empowering citizens and members of the local community to invest in projects and services, energy communities mobilise local capital. At European level, it is estimated that citizens could mobilise more than €200 billion for the energy transition by 2030.

Moreover, investing savings in local renewable energy projects reduces the money sitting in banks, preventing them from using it to keep on funding fossil fueled energy projects, the primary cause of the current climate crisis.

3. Energy communities strengthen local development

Thanks to their projects and activities, energy communities boost the competitiveness of local businesses, support key sectors, create new business opportunities and synergies, and foster cooperation. Moreover, as a result of their investments, energy communities create new jobs within local communities.

Research shows that community energy projects generate 2 to 8 times more local revenue than a project carried out by an external actor (as solar and wind power projects have shown). Unlike large private initiatives, which usually transfer the generated profits outside the community or the country (regardless of where the investment is made), energy communities distribute their profits locally. Their surpluses usually go to the members of the community or they are invested in local projects based on the needs of the community.

4. Energy communities contribute to the protection of the environment

Energy communities tend to be more respectful of the environment than large private companies, as they develop smaller-scale and locally adapted projects, and their impacts are monitored and evaluated by the citizens themselves. After all, it is citizens who decide on their own environment.

5. Energy communities help save energy

The cleanest form of energy is the one that is not consumed. Energy communities inform and raise awareness about energy saving, and promote rational energy use among their members. Research shows that . In addition, energy communities develop projects and services to increase energy efficiency and contribute to its better management with innovative projects and solutions, such as shared mobility, demand response and storage.

6. Energy communities address the environmental crisis

By developing renewable energy sources projects, promoting the efficient use of resources, proposing holistic measures to live more sustainably (low carbon mobility, zero waste practices, etc.), and organising information and education campaigns; energy communities become schools of sustainability and help build the system needed to stop the climate crisis. Community energy allows citizens to take matters into their own hands and act on climate change together.

7. Energy communities fight energy poverty

Many community-owned energy projects support energy-poor households in their area. For example, when the island of Crete was hit by an earthquake in 2021, Minoan Energy Cooperative decided to cover the electricity needs of 50 families affected by the earthquake.

As organic parts of the local community, energy communities can identify vulnerable consumers (often overlooked by institutional programmes) and design appropriate solutions for them. In fact, when municipal projects, services and actions are developed in cooperation with energy communities, their impact is greater.

8. Energy communities contribute to the social acceptance of renewables

Energy communities promote participatory planning and give neighbours the opportunity to participate in and benefit from the investment in new clean energy projects. Involving neighbours in the first steps of a project significantly increases the acceptance of renewables by the local community. A recent survey in ten European countries shows that the social acceptance of renewable energy sources increases significantly through energy communities, due to parameters such as the creation of local jobs and the reduction of energy prices.

9. Energy communities strengthen social cohesion

Participation and action within energy communities seem to increase social cohesion, as interaction and dialogue among members are enhanced. Members of an energy community work together and develop a common identity, which helps build loyalty and trust in the community. Through participatory processes, they also find collective solutions to issues that members might not be able to address individually.

Moreover, community energy projects engage the wider society by informing citizens and inviting them to participate in the design of renewable energy production and energy saving projects. Local citizens also benefit from initiatives funded by energy communities. For example, some energy communities have financed the construction of a local sustainable concert hall, while others have built a charging point for electric bicycles.

10. Energy communities reinforce democracy

Energy communities are schools of democracy because their governance model familiarises citizens with participatory decision-making processes. When members participate in the energy community, they acquire knowledge and develop skills that can be applied to other activities and interactions in other areas of life. Institutions and local businesses that cooperate directly or indirectly with energy communities also experience a positively impact. Finally, by endorsing equal participation, energy communities mitigate differences related to age, gender, etc.

 

Briefings

Travel the loo trail

For all sorts of reasons, the idea of public toilets being converted into high end restaurants seems like a bad idea but in my hometown alone I know of two in the last year. The steady stream of closures by councils everywhere of these vital public facilities is something that can turn a mild inconvenience for some, into a desperate dash for others. No surprise then that communities are increasingly stepping into the breach. Public loos are of course especially vital for tourism and so the ever creative SCOTO has just launched the SCOTO Loo Trail. 

 

Author: SCOTO

A trail of public loos across Scotland that are provided by the local community to ensure you get a warm welcome and we meet your most basic needs on your travels.

The SCOTO public loo trail

Briefings

Why communal effort is different

The effort that goes into explaining the distinctions between different aspects of third sector activity can sometimes feel like dancing on the head of a pin. Many social enterprises are charities but not all charities are social enterprises. All community action can be counted as voluntary action but not all voluntary effort is communal effort and so on. Nonetheless, there are certain features of community or communal action that can be evidenced in cultures across the world. They just have different names - bayanihan in the Philippines, talkoot in Finland and minga in South America. Different words, universal meaning.

 

Author: Jeffrey Andreoni, Shareable

What is communal work?

Communal work refers to a collaborative effort where members of a community come together to achieve a common goal or objective. It involves individuals working together in a shared space to accomplish tasks such as building houses or clinics, organizing events, providing services, or undertaking infrastructure projects. Different cultures have different names for it, such as Talkoot (Finland), Gotong-royong (Indonesia), Nachbarschaftshilfe (Germany), and Bayanihan in the Philippines.

How is communal work different from volunteering?

While communal work, volunteering, crowdsourcing, and time-banking all involve collaboration and community involvement, they differ in terms of their scope, focus, and mechanisms of participation. Communal work is specifically centered around community-driven efforts, whereas the others may encompass a broader range of activities and motivations. 

Communal spirit in the Philippines: Bayanihan

For most of us, the only time we witness such selfless acts of giving is during catastrophic events. The utopian structures of support and mutual aid come into existence during humanitarian crises, like Hurricane Katrina or the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Detailed descriptions of the elaborate support networks that sprang from the rubble during these and other disasters are the subject of the book “A Paradise Built in Hell” by author Rebecca Solnit, which shows how people can be there to support their neighbors and community. However, as Solnit herself asks, “The real question is not why this brief paradise of mutual aid and altruism appears, but rather why it is ordinarily overwhelmed by another world order.” Although this might be true in the U.S., it isn’t always the case globally.

During the eruption of the Taal volcano in the Philippines, the traditional support networks known as Bayanihan came into effect not as a temporary solution to the disaster but as an innate response that Filipinos have in both good times and bad. A response that may have its root in their concept of the “shared self” or Kapwa.

“Unlike the English word ‘Other’, Kapwa is not used in opposition to the self and does not recognize the self as a separate identity. Rather, Kapwa is the unity of self and others and hence implies a shared identity or inner self. From this arises the sense of fellow being that underlies Filipino social interaction.” — Leny Strobel

Communal work in Finland: Talkoot

But it’s not just the Philippines, where community work is part of everyday life. In Finland, Talkoot, which was initially a form of rural cooperation, has seeped into the daily lives of many Finns.

More than half the population of Finland now lives in cities, yet informal volunteering and support are still important factors in everyday life. According to Hannu Pääkkönen,

“People spend almost one hour a day in social-capital activities such as socializing, neighborly help, and volunteering; and almost one-third of the population engage in volunteering each month. Each month 60 percent of the population offer neighborly help.”

There is a Finnish maxim that says, “one must never buy what one can make.” Fittingly, a disproportionate number of pioneers in the open-source software realm have been Finnish. Most famously, the Linux operating system was initiated by Linus Torvalds in 1991, and maybe less so famous, the Swedish-Finnish-grown MySQL server architecture in 1994. Furthermore, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) was initiated by Jakko Oikarinen in 1988. In each of these cases, the work (of programming) was never done alone, and calls for support were made to develop them. One can draw the conclusion that Talkoot culture could have driven these enterprises. Tuija Aalto of the Finnish national broadcasting corporation has said,

“Finns always know how to get a big project done. Be it building a new sauna or an operating system: invite the whole community to do the job.”

In explaining the historical roots of Talkoot, docent, and scholar Tapani Köppä references the combination of long Finnish winters and short summers, which have encouraged rural communities to cooperate more willingly. Similar conditions prevail in other northern climates, and similar translations of the Finnish Talkoot can be found throughout the surrounding areas. For example, Latvians and Lithuanians use the word Talka, while in Estonian, it is described as Talgud. The Belarusian word, Тaлока (Taloka), is said by some to be a linguistic borrowing of one of the Baltic languages. Furthermore, there is a very similar word in Ukrainian, Толока (Toloka), and in Polish, it is known as Tłoka.

Traditional communal work in Latin America: Minga

In Andean countries, the tradition of communal work can be traced back to the pre-Columbian Maya and Inca civilizations, where it was known as Kuchuj and Minka, respectively. Over time Minka became Minga, the philosophy of which is not unlike the others mentioned so far.

The spirit of the traditional Minga is living together, sharing, learning, living in community, maintaining unity, and, above all, strengthening the ties between ayllus (families). One notable project keeping this spirit alive is the Alianza Solidaria housing co-op in South Quito, Ecuador.

In 2000, the cooperative purchased a plot of land of roughly six hectares (~15 acres) in the south of the city, where they built the ‘Solidaridad Quitumbe’ social housing project “dedicated to the construction of habitat, housing, and community through cooperation, self-management, and solidarity economy, and ways for good living”.

Alianza Solidaria asks its members to contribute 100 hours of community work, which is used to clean the ravines around the housing estate, and which are then given back as publicly accessible parks to all citizens, hence functioning as a commons.

But Minga goes much further. Throughout Latin America, there are many Minga-inspired organizations that take on public works projects which the state cannot afford to undertake in far-flung rural settings. One such type of project is providing running water. It is estimated that more than 77,000 such community organizations provide water to around 40 million people in rural Latin America — an unimaginable feat!

Why we need more communal work

Recently, the U.S. Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times about the “loneliness epidemic” in the U.S. In it, he writes that “At any moment, about one out of every two Americans is experiencing measurable levels of loneliness. This includes introverts and extroverts, rich and poor, and younger and older Americans.”

He starts the essay with an anecdote about a patient he once had who, after winning the lottery, found his life to be more lonely and isolated after moving from his close-knit neighborhood to a gated community. This paradox is visually palpable in a German documentary by Harun Farocki that is a personal favorite of mine called “By Comparison.” The film has no dialogue but simply shows people around the world working in groups to produce bricks.

Farocki chose to study this fundamental object due to its ubiquity in almost all societies throughout history. Some of the oldest architectural elements that are still in existence are made from bricks. Bricks are also a metaphor for humans: all different, but all doing their individual parts to hold society up, without which it would crumble.

The film begins in Burkina Faso, where an entire village is building a clinic for themselves. It’s a chaotic system but efficient, and everyone seems to be enjoying themselves.

The film then travels to India, where groups of women are making clay bricks by hand, then to the Middle East, where people are making mud bricks, and so on. All the groups of people are being social, some are paid, and some, like the folks in Burkina Faso, are volunteering for their own well-being.

Finally, we arrive at a brick factory in Switzerland. There is a solitary man, not looking particularly happy, who pushes buttons on a machine, and robots take the bricks out of an oven and stack them up; no human hands touch the product during the process. This operator’s job looks quite boring, while the others working together seem to be enjoying themselves a bit more, as much as you can while making bricks I suppose, but with the singing and dancing at the end of the day that you just don’t get with robots.

Not only is it sociality beneficial, but also the act of completing the task with others is infinitely rewarding. In the book “Shop Class as Soulcraft,” Matthew Crawford writes:

“The satisfactions of manifesting oneself concretely in the world through manual competence have been known to make a man quiet and easy. They seem to relieve him of the felt need to offer chattering interpretations of himself to vindicate his worth. He can simply point: the building stands, the car now runs, the lights are on.”

Not only do these activities make your life more enjoyable, but they also make it longer, too. The Greek island of Ikaria is known as a place where people “forget to die.” In fact, a great number of people there live past 100, and scientists have been trying to figure out why. A combination of factors like exercise, diet, and socializing seems to be the answer.

Unfortunately, for the most part, the only barn-raising to be found nowadays is tiny houses. While several websites have been launched to help people connect with their neighbors, such as Lotsa and Nextdoor, the reality is that people don’t really have time to participate in their own communities anymore. If you consider that a medieval peasant in Europe had at least 60 feast days per year, the 40-hour work week and limited PTO, though lucrative, could be costing us our health.

There are also geographic factors that inhibit community as well. The Swiss writer Hans Widmer, aka P.M., has called for an entire redesign of how neighborhoods are built to allow for more communal space where neighbors can physically connect with each and share activities. In Mexico, a legal instrument was created called Ejido whereby land can be both social and private property, which contains a mix of individually parceled land and some land that is held and used communally. A former Googler has initiated a similar concept in India where groups of people are seeking to escape the cities in favor of a more sustainable lifestyle by buying massive swaths of land that are held both privately (for your house) and collectively (for the communal farmland).

There are many barriers to forming a community in modern societies; however, it doesn’t have to be that way. There are still activities you can initiate to reinforce community bonds that don’t involve dam building. For example, I go foraging with my neighbors to gather edible plants in our area. Then we process them and pickle them so we all have these delicacies to eat throughout the year. If you think you can’t forage in your area, check out Alexis Nikole, a foraging teacher who could find food on the moon.

 

 

Briefings

A home for public sector rebels

When Senscot (Social Entrepreneur Network SCOTland) began its work, the term ‘social entrepreneur’ had a certain cachet. These were the social pioneers setting up new social businesses that would change the world for the better. At the time, many who worked in the public sector felt that they were on a similar mission albeit from a different starting point. Someone coined the phrase, ‘social intrapreneurs’ to describe those wanting to effect change from within. A proposed social intrapreneur network never took off but these folk must still exist. If so, they might find a new home in the ‘Rebel Alliance’.

 

Author: Adam Lent, New Local

‘The Rebel Alliance’. More than any other, this was the phrase that caught the imagination of the Stronger Things crowd two weeks ago when New Local’s chair, Donna Hall, used it to describe the 850 public sector innovators squeezed into the City of London’s Guildhall. The term was enthusiastically cheered at the event itself and on social media. But why did it create such a buzz?

The phrase proved resonant because it speaks of the cross-sector emergence of a movement seeking transformation of public services by empowering communities. But clearly the term was also embraced because it neatly captured an important truth: those striving for innovation do indeed feel like rebels.

I have spoken to hundreds of radical public sector innovators in my role and every one tempers their hopeful, ambitious story of change with a tale of their fight against inertia, self-interest and outdated ideas at every level of their organisation.

The uphill battle faced by the Rebel Alliance should worry us far more than it does. Their support for community power is a response to the very serious challenges facing councils: primarily, spiralling demand. Community power aims to mobilise every single asset in an area to meet the underlying causes of that demand crisis: health inequality, family breakdown, poverty, isolation.

But whenever the system makes community-powered innovators feel like marginal rebels, it is essentially saying that the status quo is sustainable and the old ways are good enough. In short, every time an innovator is stymied, the public sector is one step closer to its ultimate demise in the face of an unaddressed demand crisis.

It would be easy to say that the secret to changing this situation is to liberate the rebels; to empower those driving change rather than marginalising them. In my experience, this is not what the community power rebels want – to be given some special status as ‘innovators-in-chief’. This is not a movement with a simplistic, Silicon Valley mentality that values all innovation and disruption for its own sake or thinks that innovators are some special breed.

Instead, their wish is for public sector leaders to recognise that community-powered change has to be everyone’s business. Those leaders need to set out a clear vision of public sector transformation and then do the long, hard work of making that transformation a reality across the whole system – for everyone who works in or relies on it.

In large part, that also means a profound rethinking of their roles as leaders – shifting away from a monitor-and-control mentality towards an inspire-and-mobilise mindset that mimics the spirit at the heart of the community power movement itself.

Many leaders are indeed already thinking and acting this way, but too many are not. Apart from some inspiring exceptions, it is notable that the leaders who sit at the very top of the system in Whitehall and Westminster have a particularly stagnant approach, remaining largely oblivious to the radical change happening on the ground, and immune to the self-reflection required to ensure their leadership style is a motor of rather than a brake on change.

At the very start of Stronger Things, Ian Thomas – the chief executive of the City of London Corporation – pointed out that talk about a systemic shift in public services has been going on for years but that it is action not talk that generates change. Like Donna’s comments, Ian’s words resonated because the Rebel Alliance is made up of doers who are tired of fine words that go nowhere.

The time is more than ripe for public sector leaders to follow that example by working with this new movement to dismantle resistance and take action to generate the meaningful change that will keep public services healthy for current and future generations.

Briefings

Comparing island lives

Whether it is due to the interminable ferry fiasco, the perpetual housing crisis or the additional cost of everything, life on our islands seems pretty precarious. And while there’s always a temptation for the grass to appear greener, in this case, on the other side of the Irish Sea, it’s hard not to be impressed with the Irish Government’s new ten year strategy - Our Living Islands - which focuses on their thirty inhabited islands. Perhaps this year’s Scottish Rural and Islands Parliament, due to be held in Fort William, might do a ‘compare and contrast’ with our own National Islands Plan.

 

Author: Government of Ireland

Our coastal islands and their communities are an integral part of the fabric of rural Ireland. They also an integral part of the State’s heritage and have a special significance in Irish culture.

There are around 30 islands off the coast of Ireland that are new cut off daily by the tide, are not connected to the mainland by a bridge or causeway, have permanent year-round populations and are not in private ownership.

Good transport services and a developed infrastructure are important prerequisites for maintaining island populations. The Department’s aim is to seek to meet these requirements through current and capital investment via the Department itself and through other relevant Departments and organisations.

Our Living Islands is a 10-year national policy for these off-shore islands, and was published in June 2023.

The aim of this policy is to ensure that sustainable, vibrant communities can continue to live – and thrive – on the offshore islands for many years to come.

Related to that aim is our ambition that visitors to the islands can continue to experience and appreciate the unique culture, heritage and environmental richness that the islands have to offer.

This whole-of-Government policy has been developed following an extensive consultation process with the island communities and other stakeholders.

Our Living Islands – National Islands Policy 2023-2033

Download

The policy is underpinned by five high-level strategic objectives, identified by islanders themselves as being of key importance for the sustainable future of their communities:

  1. Revitalise population levels on the islands
  2. Diversify island economies
  3. Enhance Health and Wellbeing services
  4. Empower Island Communities
  5. Build smart sustainable futures

The policy is accompanied by an Action Plan for the period 2023-2026 that includes 80 time-bound actions which will be implemented by various stakeholders, led by a nominated Government Department or State Agency.

Some of the specific actions of this policy are;

  • Providing island-specific additional grant support under the Vacant Property Refurbishment Grant (Croí Cónaithe) to encourage utilisation of existing properties for the provision of long-term residential accommodation.
  • Deliver high-speed broadband to broadband connection points (BCPs), digital hubs and schools on the islands under the National Broadband Plan (NBP), and drive remote working from islands and enable greater access to education and training courses.
  • Pilot eHealth Pods on islands and utilise BCPs and remote working hubs to improve access to online health appointments.
  • Ensure that island communities’ voices are heard through the establishment and support of a forum for ongoing dialogue between the island communities, Local Authorities and relevant stakeholders.

Our Living Islands – Action Plan 2023-2026

Download

 

Briefings

Where next for community benefits 

When the idea of community benefit payments was first mooted, it related to wind farm developers and the implication was that these payments were somehow a compensation for the visual impact of sticking up large turbines where previously there had been none. Community benefit has recently become a much more widely applied concept to any changes in land use or ownership. However, much work requires to be done to clarify what form that benefit should take, who should receive it and, most fundamentally of all, why. Useful contribution from Scottish Land Commission in relation to the emerging natural capital market.

 

Author: Scottish land Commission

We have published a discussion paper drawing together our current thinking on some of the key questions about community benefits from investment in natural capital.

We have proposed a definition of community benefits in this context and a set of expectations about how community benefits should be identified and delivered. For the purposes of this paper, we are referring to investments in natural capital on land.

We have been working with investors, landowners, and other key organisations to explore different approaches to delivering community benefits from investment in natural capital. A series of case studies outline some of the broad approaches taken to in delivering community benefits from natural capital. Personalised support is being provided through our Good Practice Programme for a small number of innovators who want to explore different approaches to community benefits, including shared governance models, financial packages, and local economic development. Working with others involved in this field, we will provide more detailed thought and guidance for policy and practice in mid-2023.

This is a rapidly developing area and we are keen to hear from those already working in the field to test our thinking. We want to identify realistic but ambitious expectations for how investment in natural capital enhancement, restoration and creation projects can deliver community benefits in addition to wider public benefits and private benefits.