Briefings

Local know-how on the map

March 27, 2013

<p>Who holds the useful (and useless) information about your community? &nbsp;The truth is that we&rsquo;ve all probably discovered something about where we live that no one else has noticed. &nbsp;And in the past, that knowledge might have stayed with you and you alone. Now, thanks to the application of new mapping technology allied to the open source principles of wiki, communities across the world are developing an important new local resource. &nbsp;Dunbar is leading the way in Scotland.</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

 

Local know-how on the map

 

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a collaborative project to create a free editable map of the world. Two major driving forces behind the establishment and growth of OSM have been restrictions on use or availability of map information across much of the world and the advent of inexpensive portable satellite navigation devices.[4]

Founded by Steve Coast in the UK in 2004, it was inspired by the success of Wikipedia and preponderance of proprietary map data in the UK and elsewhere.[5] Since then, it has grown to around three hundred thousand contributors,[6] who collect data using GPSdevices, aerial photography, and other free sources. This crowdsourced data is then made available under the Open Database License. The site is supported by the OpenStreetMap Foundation, a non-profit organization registered in England.

Rather than the map itself, the data generated by the OpenStreetMap project is considered its primary output. This data is then available for use in both traditional applications, like its usage by Craigslist and Foursquare to replace Google Maps, and more unusual roles, like replacing default data included with GPS receivers. These data have been favorably compared with proprietary datasources, though data quality varies worldwide.

 

This is how Sustaining Dunbar invited local people to its mapping party last weekend……

Mapping parties are events where anyone can come and participate in the OpenStreetMap project. OpenStreetMap is a free, open source map that can be contributed, edited and used by anyone, anywhere. Mapping parties are social events where experienced and new mappers can meet to share and learn more about the project. The event is open to all.  

Join us for our first meet-up and mapping party on Saturday 23 March 2013 10am – 4pm, Bleachingfield Centre, Dunbar. We will teach you how to survey, edit and upload to OpenStreetMap website. We hope to create a map to showcase the facilities, points of interest of the area, sustainable infrastructure and help improve access and management in the future.   

 

It’s fun. It’s free. You can help! 

 

Check out the wiki page for more details – here

When: Saturday 23 March 2012 10:00-16:30

Where: Bleachingfield Centre, Dunbar

Resources: Have a look at ‘sustainability’ map of Dunbar so far and starting editing/adding features: here

 

Event schedule: 

 

10:00 Meet at the Bleachingfield Centre – greetings and refreshments

10:30 Plan mapping strategy, introduction and training for New mappers

11:00 Go map!

13:30 Meet back at centre for lunch – Not provided! – bring pack lunch or buy something at the cafe in the centre

 

14:15 More mapping 

 

15:30 Editing and updating the map 

 

16:00 Finish – or go to the bar to celebrate!

 

If you own a GPS, smartphone, digital camera or laptop computer, please bring it along. If not, we will have equipment to loan.

 

 Weather: This event is rain or shine – please dress appropirately for walking outside in all weather

 

Briefings

Hutters’ future assured

<p>Given Scotland&rsquo;s easy access to open countryside, it is something of a mystery that more people don&rsquo;t take advantage it on a regular basis. For instance, in Nordic countries it&rsquo;s common practice to be involved in hutting - the building and enjoyment of simple structures (usually wooden) for living, working and recreation in the countryside. &nbsp; It&rsquo;s not completely unheard of in Scotland &ndash; there exists a small but growing band of supporters of this back-to-nature recreation. &nbsp;Scotland&rsquo;s most established colony of hutters has just had some great news.</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

Hutters’ future assured

Seen as pioneers of the Scottish hutting movement, the Carbeth hutting cooperative near the Campsie Fells has found £1.75m to buy their land, more than 80 years after first setting camp

The Carbeth Hutters, the community of self-sufficient cabin-owners near the Campsie Fells which has helped inspire a national hutting revival, has succeeded in buying all its land and forest from their landlord.

After fifteen years of often rancorous disputes, a rent strike and then careful negotiation with the owner, the Carbeth Hutters Community company has bought their 90 acres of land – valued at £1.75m, after securing a vital loan from the Triodos bank.

The community of more than 140 huts, which varies from modern kit buildings, smartly-painted cabins through to hand-built, idiosyncratic huts, was originally founded in the 1920s and 1930s by socialists and communists wanting an escape from Glasgow and Clydebank.

Its low-impact lifestyle is highly-prized and protected. There is no mains electricity or mains water; just standpipes, gas lamps (some of pre-war vintage) and a motley collection of micro-wind turbines and solar panels.

In a statement issued to announce the purchase, Morven Gregor, the community company’s chairwoman, said:

The future of hutting is now in our own hands. We look forward to keeping hutting alive in the twenty-first century, building on traditions going back to the 1920s. It’s been an exciting 15 years. The next 15 will be equally exciting.

Gerry Loose, its secretary, added: Carbeth can now begin to celebrate its part in Scotland’s history and open its doors to all comers to see how we did it and why it matters to Scotland’s heritage.

Along with several other long-established hutting communities, Carbeth has been a central part of the Thousand Huts movement set up to promote hutting in Scotland as a sustainable way of building rural retreats and low-impact housing.

Across Scandinavia, hutting is embedded in mainstream life: in Norway alone, there are thought to be nearly 430,000 cabins and holiday chalets, perched on lakesides, island and mainland coasts and deep in its forests.

In 2010, the community settled a long-running rent strike with its owner Allan Barns-Graham, who agreed to give them three years to raise the capital needed to buy the forest grounds. The deal includes its lido, an open air swimming pool, and land used by the original “fellowship camp” where the community took root.

The leases is due to be signed on Sunday, at Edmonstone Hall, Blanefield just nearby.

And their success was applauded by the Barns-Graham family, which has owned the estate for more than a century; they said the size of the buy-out was rare given the economic climate. They praised the hutters “tireless” work since 2010 to raise the money needed.

Over the same period and prior to purchase, CHCC has established a very successful track record in managing the hutting operation. This has given their funders, Triodos Bank, the confidence it requires to help fund the acquisition.

This is particularly remarkable because the financing of any land purchase is so very difficult in the current economic climate. There must surely be very few land transactions of this type and magnitude in the UK at the present time.

The Barns-Graham family is extremely proud, as I know CHCC is too, for what has been achieved and together we look forward to see the Carbeth hutting operation develop in the years ahead.

Briefings

Quirk’s new design

<p>Six years ago, the Westminster Government commissioned an enquiry into the whole question of community ownership and management of public assets. Barry Quirk, chief executive of Lewisham Council was appointed to lead the enquiry. To the surprise of many, the Quirk Review came out strongly in favour of communities taking over public assets &ndash; the report is widely viewed as being a watershed moment in this debate. &nbsp;More recently Quirk has been thinking about the future shape of public services. &nbsp;In his opinion (always worth listening to), we&rsquo;re lacking in design skills.</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

Quirk’s new design 

Barry Quirk, Guardian

When Barking & Dagenham council, in east London, wanted to improve its waste services, it turned to a perhaps surprising resource: a design agency.

By doing research and running workshops with local people, the designers were able to tackle some of the causes of major frustration and confusion for residents and the council. More than 70 ideas for improved services came out of the workshops and many have been put into practice, including clearer information about how to dispose of things, new signs to tell people about facilities, and ways to work more closely with local shopkeepers and traders to keep alleyways clear of rubbish. Not only did services improve; the council also made savings of an initial £20,000.

Everyone agrees that public services need to be better, quicker and cheaper. Public sector leaders need a nuanced approach to reshaping the public sector. They need to get into the granular detail of their services; to work out how to make them relevant and discover the best ways of reducing their costs.

There is no simple way to do this, but the Design Commission – an industry-led group that conducts research into policy problems that could benefit from design – has recently concluded a parliamentary inquiry into how design can contribute to renewing public services.

Design is not a panacea for public service reform. But, as our report, published Wednesday, shows, we genuinely believe that public sector leaders need to acquire design skills if they are to stand a reasonable chance of reshaping and refashioning the services for which they are responsible. Design offers a fresh approach to rethinking policy, redrawing professional practice and reshaping service delivery.

Design starts with user experiences, involves tangible prototyping of possible solutions and ends with new ways to deliver value to users. It rests on creativity and leads to innovation. Throughout the UK there are many examples in central government and across local authorities of design-led innovation. But so much more needs to be achieved; here are some pointers.

Great design rests on real discussions about visible, tangible options for change. Central government could do a lot to raise the profile of design-led innovation and promote it as part of the policymaking. The Design Council has done a lot to promote the use of design in industry and across the public sector, but design needs a sponsor inside government.

“Design skills” are insufficiently developed in the public sector. Not enough civil servants or local government professionals know how to add basic design methods to their own portfolio of practice. Neither would they be confident of knowing when and how to buy professional design support. That is why we think there is a real need for training and information.

There is a shortage of professional designers who can work across public services to help lower costs and heighten effectiveness. We need more of them if we are going to use design to address the public service challenge. This means making changes to design teaching while encouraging designers to see the public sector as a potential partner.

Our report has tried to address some of these problems by explaining what we mean by design, why it might be helpful, and by providing directions to other resources. It has toolkits, contact lists of designers and details about training providers. We have tried to knit together what might otherwise seem a fragmented range of practice across disparate service areas.

We have discovered that most of the rest of the world thinks we in the UK are already the experts at this. But what is needed is a major boost in public sector design thinking and practice. After all, the only way a circle can be squared is through design.

• Barry Quirk is chief executive of Lewisham council and co-chair of the Design Commission inquiry

Briefings

How radical could land reform become?

<p>When the land reform legislation passed through Scottish Parliament, some of the more hysterical reactions in the press forewarned of &lsquo;Mugabe&rsquo; style land-grabs. &nbsp;Ten years on, we&rsquo;ve yet to see the first successful &lsquo;hostile&rsquo; right to buy, and while Scotland&rsquo;s community land owners are a growing movement in their own right, the dominant pattern of land ownership remains as concentrated as ever. &nbsp;How committed is the Scottish Government towards truly radical reform? &nbsp; Perhaps the First Minister has just offered a signal as to which way he is inclined.</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

How radical could land reform become?

Community Land Scotland has today announced that the First Minister is to be their keynote speaker at their annual conference in Skye in June.

Welcoming the First Minister’s attendance, David Cameron, Chairman of Community Land Scotland said,

“I am delighted the First Minister has accepted our invitation to be our keynote conference speaker. His attendance symbolises the growing recognition within the Scottish Government of community land owning as a key driver in regenerating communities.

The Conference falls shortly after the interim report of the Land Reform Review Group is due to be published and provides the First Minister with an ideal opportunity to both re-affirm the Scottish Government’s commitment to further land reform and perhaps to set out some of the practical steps the Scottish Government will take to advance that cause. We are already looking forward to what he will have to say.”

The Community Land Scotland Annual Conference will take place at Sabhal Mor Ostaig on Skye on the 7th and 8th June 2013.

Briefings

Litter strategy needs community buy in

<p>For every 100 meters of Scotland&rsquo;s roads, you&rsquo;ll find seven discarded bottles or cans. Litter is a national problem and the Scottish Government has decided it is time we did something about it &ndash; a National Litter Strategy is being devised. Last week&rsquo;s Litter Summit heard the Cabinet Sec. Richard Lochhead set out some initial ideas including the prospect of increased fixed penalty fines. &nbsp;Sticks are probably necessary but behaviour change on the scale being envisaged needs carrots too. To succeed, the Strategy also needs to be community led.&nbsp;</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

Litter strategy needs community buy in 

Litter fines could be increased under plans discussed at a national litter summit in Edinburgh last week.

Increasing the fixed penalty notices (FPNs) for litter and flytipping from the current £50 level is one option being considered to tackle the blight of litter, Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead told participants at the summit.

Scotland’s first national litter strategy is currently being developed for consultation from this summer and increases in the FPN is expected to be part of the wider consultation on the strategy. 

With Scotland hosting the Commonwealth Games and Ryder Cup next year the Scottish Government is committed to ensuring the country is looking its best when the eyes of the world are watching. The recent Scottish Household Survey highlights that around a quarter of the population believe litter is a problem in their communities. 

Speaking at the event Mr Lochhead said:  

“Scotland really is a beautiful country and in this Year of Natural Scotland we want to do all that we can to show it at its best. Let’s not miss this huge opportunity to show the Scotland’s magnificence.

“I want our National Litter Strategy to achieve a clean, safe environment for people who live in and visit Scotland – where littering is no longer acceptable. The strategy we consult on will be a package of measures to encourage people not to litter or flytip. Today’s attendees will help shape our proposals which will also include how education and infrastructure can support clean, safe communities. 

“Litter costs local authorities, transport providers and other businesses millions to clean up – and we all pay for it. We can each take personal responsibility for disposing of waste responsibly and avoid this unnecessary and expensive eyesore. 

“I encourage councils and the police to use their existing powers to issue litter and flytipping FPNs and I will consult on whether it would be helpful if the level was raised from £50. Over the next few months we will work with local authorities and others to identify what the consultation should propose.”

Cllr Stephen Hagan, COSLA Spokesperson for Development, Economy and Sustainability, said: 

“Scottish local authorities want to see as much litter as possible being prevented. A significant amount of local authority resources are spent tackling litter issues and, at a time of severe financial constraint, if costs can be avoided this would not only improve the environment but allow investment of these resources in the delivery of services. 

“This development of a National Litter Strategy provides an opportunity to engage and explore the ways in which everyone can work together to reduce litter across Scotland.”

Iain Gulland, Director of Zero Waste Scotland, said:

“We know that the everyday problem of litter affects our streets, communities and environment. As if this wasn’t bad enough, Scotland wastes millions in clearing and cleaning this up and in lost value of discarded materials that could be recycled.

“It’s important that there is active engagement by everyone who has a role to play in tackling litter. Through its work on recycling and resource management, the Zero Waste Scotland programme is looking at why people litter and what more could be done to prevent this.

“The forthcoming national strategy will be a new opportunity to address litter in a variety of ways and the delivery of Zero Waste Scotland will continue to be central to the recommendations to come.”

Background

Councils can issue fixed penalty notices for littering and most incidents are dealt with in this way.  People can face a fine of up to £2,500 for dropping litter and up to £40,000 (and/or 12 months imprisonment) for flytipping if convicted by a court. 

This year alone Zero Waste Scotland have invested almost £2 million in work to prevent litter and increase recycling. This includes 2,700 new recycling bins in over 250 busy public places across Scotland.

Briefings

Need to engage with Euro funds

<p>In its bulletin last week, Senscot fired a warning shot across our bows, highlighting a new six year tranche of European funding is on its way. Scottish Government has been hosting a series of information sessions around the country and Senscot reports that social enterprise and the community sectors have been notable by our absence. &nbsp;Senscot has produced a briefing paper which is a useful introduction but we need to get up to speed with this.</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

 

Need to engage with Euro funds

Since it is based on Draft EU Regulations, this paper carries a “health warning”. There may be one or two separate Operational Programmes for Scotland. Because the Scottish Government has not released its latest thinking on these developments, there may yet be changes.  

A) INTRODUCTION 

1) The purpose of this paper is to begin focusing Social Enterprise intentions and objectives for the forthcoming EU Structural Funds Programme 2014-2020. On Friday 08 February 2013, EU Budget ceilings were agreed by EU Heads of State at the Dublin Summit. Since the EU Parliament has the power to veto this and discussions between the Council and Parliament begin this week, it is anticipated that there may be transfers within the ceilings agreed. The broad shape of EU Structural Funds for this Programme has already been set out in: 

ERDF Regulation, COM(2011) 614 final of October 06 2011

ESF Regulation COM(2011) 607 final /2 of March 14 2012

Common Strategic Framework Regulation COM(2012) 496 final of September 11 2012

2) This paper seeks to match Thematic Objectives and Investment Priorities in these Regulations with Outcomes and Objectives in the current Support Social Enterprise programme funded by Scottish Government. 

B) FOCUS NEEDED FOR ESF 

ESF Regulation COM(2011) 607 final /2 of March 14 2012, Article 4 Consistency and Thematic Con-centration says: 

1) More Developed Regions (likely to be most of Central Scotland) must choose to have 80% of ESF in up to four Investment Priorities

2) Transitional Regions (likely to be Highlands and Islands) must choose 70% of ESF in up to four In-vestment Priorities below

3) The 18 Investment Priorities for the 4 Thematic Objectives mainly supported by ESF are shown below.  

C) FOCUS NEEDED FOR ERDF

Draft ERDF Regulation, COM(2011) 614 final of October 06 2011, Article 4 Thematic Concentration says: 

a) In Transition and More Developed Regions

i) 80% ERDF to focus on Research and Innovation and Competiveness of SMEs (strengthening research, technological development and innovation; enhancing the competitiveness of small  and medium-sized enterprises: supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors)

ii) 20% ERDF to focus on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors)

D) MATCHING SUPPORTING SOCIAL ENTEPRISE PROGRAMME WITH ERDF AND ESF OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES 

This Section begins matching Outcomes and Objectives in the Scottish Government Supporting Social Enterprise Programme with ERDF Thematic Objectives and  ESF Investment Priorities.

  (8) promoting employment and supporting labour mobility:

ERDF

a) development of business incubators and investment support for self employment and busi-ness creation

b) local development initiatives and aid for structures providing neighbourhood services to cre-ate new jobs, where such actions are outside the scope of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [ESF]

c) investing in infrastructure for public employment services

ESF 

a) Access to employment for job-seekers and inactive people, including local employment initia-tives and support for labour mobility;

b) Sustainable integration of young people not in employment, education or training into the la-bour market

c) Self-employment, entrepreneurship and business creation

d) Equality between men and women and reconciliation between work and private life

e) Adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change

f) Active and healthy ageing

g) Modernisation and strengthening of labour market institutions, including actions to enhance transnational labour mobility

 (9) promoting social inclusion and combating poverty:

ERDF

a) investing in health and social infrastructure which contribute to national, regional and local de-velopment, reducing inequalities in terms of health status, and transition from institutional to community-based services;

b) support for physical and economic regeneration of deprived urban and rural communities;

c) support for Social Enterprises;

ESF 

a) Active inclusion

b) Integration of marginalised communities such as the Roma

c) Combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation

d) Enhancing access to affordable, sustainable and high-quality services, including health care and social services of general interest

e) Promoting the Social Economy and Social Enterprises

f) Community-led Local Development Strategies

 (10) investing in education, skills and lifelong learning infrastructure 

ERDF

investing in education, skills and lifelong learning by developing education and training infrastruc-ture

ESF

a) Reducing early school-leaving and promoting equal access to good quality early-childhood, pri-mary and secondary education

b) Improving the quality, efficiency and openness of tertiary and equivalent education with a view to increasing participation and attainment levels

c) Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems

(11) enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration

ERDF

by strengthening of institutional capacity and the efficiency of public administrations and public services related to implementation of the ERDF, and in support of actions in institutional capacity and in the efficiency of public administration supported by the ESF.

ESF

a) Investment in institutional capacity and in the efficiency of public administrations and public services with a view to reforms, better regulation and good governance

This Investment Priority is only applicable throughout the territory of the Member States which have at least one NUTS level 2 region as defined in Article 82(2) (a) of Regulation (EU) No […] or in Member States eligible for Cohesion Fund support. (Eastern Scotland, South Western Scotland, North Eastern Scotland and Highlands and Islands are Scotland’s 4 NUTS 2 Regions.) 

b) Capacity building for stakeholders delivering employment, education and social policies and sectoral and territorial pacts to mobilise for reform at national, regional and local level.

 

Briefings

£100 million and counting

<p>In the last edition of Local People Leading, we highlighted the case of Lanark Community Development Trust falling foul of a lack of joined up decision making between funders. &nbsp;It prompted a query within the Alliance about just how much public funding is available to the sector. &nbsp;This proved harder than we thought so we&rsquo;re crowdsourcing for more information. &nbsp;If you can fill in gaps or spot any sources we&rsquo;ve missed, please let us know. &nbsp;Even so, the running total - &pound;100m a year - took us by surprise.&nbsp;</p> <p>27/03/13</p>

 

£100 million and counting

For the purposes of this exercise, only public funding that is available in the form of grant ie only Govt and Lottery funds were included. Social investment funds, where there is an element of loan finance mixed with grant have been excluded at this point but it may well be that a further scoping of this funding should be carried out. Charitable trusts and grant funds from the private sector have also been excluded.

The spreadsheet can be accessed here

Any suggestions for additions or corrections please email info@scottishcommunityalliance.net with the heading Community Sector Funding 

Briefings

Arguing to maintain the status quo

March 13, 2013

<p>The sensitivities around Raasay, were no doubt heightened because of the Government&rsquo;s renewed focus on land reform and the work of the Land Reform Review Group. &nbsp;Given the nature of the remit given to the Review Group, it&rsquo;s no surprise that many private landowners are worried that the long established patterns of land ownership may be about to change . &nbsp;These concerns are reflected not just by the size of their written evidence to the Review Group (230+ pages) but in a short promotional film, both of which try to argue for the status quo.&nbsp;</p> <p>13/03/13</p>

 

 

The trade body of Scotland’s private landowners, Scottish Land and Estates has published its response to the Land Reform Review Group.

A summary copy of the report can be downloaded from here

To see the short promotional film produced by Scottish Land and Estates to support their position in relation to the Review click here

 

Briefings

The year Britain went socialist

<p>Ken Loach has a new film coming out this week &ndash; The Spirit of &rsquo;45 &ndash; which he seems to have made &nbsp;out of concern that the enormous social gains from that era are about to be crushed by the modern day health and welfare reforms. The documentary is a mix of film archive spliced with interviews from a few people with memories of how things were back then. The themes of citizenship and common good run throughout the film, themes that are so markedly absent in today&rsquo;s world.</p> <p>13/03/13</p>

 

Yvonne Roberts, The Observer,

Director Ken Loach’s new film revisits the year that Britons turned to socialism – and ushered in the NHS, public ownership and the concept of public (not private) good. We trace the spirit of ’45 and speak to some who remember the dawn of a new life.

Ray Davies, robust, articulate and dignified, aged 83, veteran campaigner, a Labour councillor in Caerphilly for 50 years, sits in a Spanish civil war beret and recalls the time, in 1945, when he was 15 and had already worked two years underground in Welsh mines.

“In those days, it wasn’t safety that came first, it was coal,” he says. “We were in the pit and the message came down – ‘Labour’s won by a landslide!’ Tough, hard miners had tears streaking down their faces, black with dust. They said, ‘Ray, this is what we’ve dreamed about all our lives. Public control of the railways and mines and banks, jobs and housing. We are going to have a health service!’ ” Ray’s voice still resonates with the thrill of it all. “We owed trillions to the Americans at the end of the war, we had nothing, but we said, ‘Knickers to the debt. We are going to put this country back on its feet.’ And we did! The average life expectancy of a miner was 42 years. Then that began to creep up. It was wonderful to see how things improved for the ordinary man and woman.”

Ray Davies is one of a number of octogenarian “stars” of The Spirit of ’45, an uplifting documentary by the film-maker and master chronicler of ordinary lives, Ken Loach. It celebrates 1945, a pivotal year, and its brief aftermath, during which socialism was proudly endorsed and openly promoted by a Labour leader, Clement Attlee. On the stump, Winston Churchill had failed to convince when he attempted to link socialism and “the gestapo”. Booed and heckled, he was then trounced by the electorate.

Labour’s 1945 general election manifesto included clause IV, subsequently erased by Tony Blair, which promised “to secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry… upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange…” The manifesto also pledged a massive and speedy housing programme so that “every family has a good standard of accommodation”. The country was broke, battered, and in parts physically flattened, but certainly it was no longer bowed.

For The Spirit of ’45, Loach has mined British regional and national archives and found deeply moving film footage and sound recordings that powerfully illustrate a country determined to build a very different community out of the rubble of war and create a new social fabric. “We had won the war together,” Loach says. “Together we could win the peace. If we could collectively plan to wage military campaigns, could we not plan to build houses, create a health service and make goods needed for reconstruction? The spirit of the age was to be our brother’s and our sister’s keeper.”

Years of poverty and unemployment after the first world war had been followed by six years battling fascism and experiencing huge personal loss in the second. In one piece of archive footage in Loach’s film, a woman says, after her house has been destroyed by a German bomb: “But I only cleaned my windows yesterday.” Peace gave birth to a country with different expectations and priorities. Seventy per cent of the population considered itself working-class and it now voiced modest aspirations with hugely radical potential.

The historian David Kynaston recalls the scale of the change in his book Austerity Britain, which covers the same period as Loach’s documentary. The book describes a “blazered, straw-hatted 14-year-old public schoolboy, John Rae” (later headmaster of Westminster School), waiting on Bishop’s Stortford station in July 1945 with his trunk. “My man,” he called to the porter. “No,” came the porter’s firm reply. “That sort of thing is all over now.”

The new prime minister, Clement Attlee, and the health and housing minister, Aneurin (Nye) Bevan, used the scale of the challenge of building a new Jerusalem and the necessity of centralised planning to justify a massive programme of nationalisation. Roads, rail, steel, docks, coal, utilities – all came into state ownership. Most triumphant and resilient of all was the birth of the National Health Service in 1948. “We realised that the only people who were going to help us were ourselves, the people,” says Ray Davies.

“One for all and all for one, homes for the many, not luxuries for the few, that’s what we wanted,” says 90-year-old Eileen Thompson, another of Loach’s interviewees. “People weren’t greedy. They just wanted a job and a peaceful home life.” She grew up in “poverty park” in the slums of Liverpool in the 1930s. “As a child,” she tells me, “my father took me to see the unemployment queues, a long, long line. He said, ‘Never let this happen again.’ ”

Loach says he was motivated to make the documentary because the achievements of the Attlee generation were at risk of being reduced to a footnote to Thatcherism. “People talk about Thatcherism all the time,” he says. “I felt it was important to record the memories of those almost written out of history who upheld the spirit of ’45. Today, the market penetrates everywhere. It’s time to put back on the agenda the importance of public ownership and public good, the value of working together collaboratively, not in competition.”

The American philosopher Michael Sandel, in the Reith Lectures in 2009, warned that the priorities of the shareholder and the “values” of the marketplace were brutally damaging the civic pulse. “A politics of the common good invites us to think of ourselves less as consumers and more as citizens,” he said. It is these themes of citizenship and the common good that run through The Spirit of ’45 like an electric charge, underlining the absence of these values from so much of public discussion and culture now.

June Hautot, 76, another of the film’s stars, still lives in the house in south London where her mother died when June was 11. Her father, a railway worker, had been wounded in the war but before the NHS was set up couldn’t afford to be properly treated, or to take time off work. June’s mother, in her 40s, developed breast cancer that spread to her spine. The family belonged to one of several thousand private insurance schemes that only partially met the cost of sickness.

“You had to pay the doctor five shillings before he’d even put his foot over the threshold,” June recalls. “My older sister and I used to care for my mother but then the NHS arrived, overnight, and we didn’t have to do it any more. A district nurse arrived. It was absolutely wonderful.” In 2012, Hautot famously confronted the then health secretary Andrew Lansley in Downing Street, shouting “Shame!” and accusing him of privatising the NHS. “Tony Benn says ‘People change things not politics.’ I believe that,” she says. “Nobody is taking the NHS away from us. Nobody.”

Sam Watts, 88, was a rigger on the docks when he and his wife and two children were moved from the Liverpool slums to a council house in Bootle, in which – 65 years later – he still lives. “We couldn’t believe it,” he told me. “We had a kitchen and a bathroom and a backyard. Now they are all sold off or rented for £550 a month. Can you believe it?” His wife, Bridie, was diagnosed with TB aged 27. “They said it would take 12 months to build her up to have her lung removed and 12 months to recover. The NHS had just come in. Before that people died of TB. In Liverpool you’d see people sitting outside their houses. You knew they were going to die. They’d been told to take fresh air. Bridie lived another 50 years. She was never the same person but she lived, thanks to the NHS.”

GPs had been overwhelmingly against the NHS, and the British Medical Association warned that the socialist health secretary would become a “medical fuhrer”. Nye Bevan dealt with their opposition by allowing consultants to continue with their lucrative private practice and, as he put it, “stuffing their mouths with gold”. However, as the Loach documentary illustrates, some doctors were great enthusiasts of a universal service based on need not income.

Professor Harry Keen, 87, a diabetes specialist for 50 years, and founder of the NHS Support Federation, which aims to protect the founding values of the NHS, still holds a clinic once a week. He recalls a visit to a boy called Billy in his home in the summer of 1948, soon after qualifying. “I received two shillings and sixpence and said I would call back. When I returned the mother informed me that Billy was a lot better. But as we spoke I heard a loud hacking cough: ‘That’s not Billy, its Johnny his brother,’ the mother said. When I offered to take a look at Johnny, she said, ‘I’d rather you didn’t, we really can’t afford it.’ I told her that today was 5 July, the birth of the NHS. From then on, my services would be free. What a great day!”

By the time the Conservatives regained power with a small majority in 1951, after six years of a socialist Labour government, the welfare state had strong foundations and more than 40% of the country’s industrial capacity was nationalised. But as The Spirit of ’45 points out, there were inherent flaws. No workers’ representation, chronic lack of investment, little long-term planning and the appointment of senior management from the pre-nationalisation era who had little commitment to state-run industries. As one union activistin the film says: “What sort of nationalisation have we got when the same old gang is back in power?”

Having recorded the scale of the postwar generation’s commitment to the new Jerusalem, its origins, triumphs and its failings, Loach’s film then tackles the rapid dismantling of it with the arrival of Margaret Thatcher in 1979. She espoused a very different ideology based on small-government, low-tax, free-market, neo-liberal, anti-union, pro-privatisation, “no such thing as society” monetarism. That “light touch” on finance and business and her desire to “roll back the frontiers of the state” was little challenged by 13 years of Labour under Gordon Brown and Tony Blair. The documentary illustrates how under New Labour, individualism gnawed at the collectivist muscle, and the private sector moved deeper into the very last of the nationalised industries, the NHS. “Economics are the method,” Margaret Thatcher told an interviewer in 1981. “The object is to change the heart and soul.”

In 1984, she took on and defeated the National Union of Mineworkers. Shortly after, British Telecom, British Aerospace and British Gas were handed back to shareholders. Steel, water, Rolls-Royce and British Airways were all privatised. Millions of jobs disappeared in steel, coal and manufacturing. In the early 1980s, cleaning and catering in the NHS were contracted out; the market moved in to universal free health care.

Karen Reissmann of Unison, and a mental health nurse in Bolton, says: “We used to have two full-time cleaners in the morning on the ward and one part-time in the evening… After contracting out, we had half a cleaner in the morning and one covering 10 wards in the evening. That’s not good economics if it leads to the cost of MRSA.”

What the documentary doesn’t cover is the March 2012 Health and Social Care bill to reform the NHS, opposed by 25 out of 26 medical colleges. Last week the government published new regulations that, according to the Royal College of Physicians, “will have the effect of forcing through privatisation regardless of the will of the local people. Once this is triggered [the deadline is 31 March], it means private providers gain rights which make halting their encroachment financially – and thus politically – virtually impossible.”

“If they privatise the health service we will lose something beyond price,” Professor Keen tells me. “It’s not all about greed. Humans have a social sense too.”

James Meadway, senior economist at the thinktank the New Economics Foundation, points out in The Spirit of ’45 that the assumption that the private sector is more efficient is not proven. He tells me that the myths that a bloated public sector and excessive spending under a Labour government are the prime cause of current austerity also need to be strenuously challenged. Up to 2008, Meadway says, Labour spent less on the public sector as a proportion of GDP (39%) than Thatcher (41%) or Major (40%). He argues for an alternative narrative as bold as that which once cradled the spirit of 1945. “There are other scripts that can be written. Ones that put the importance of solidarity ahead of competition and the need to defend the common and the public from the incursion of the private. We need a credible alternative story to disintegrating Osbornomics. Or we can say goodbye to the welfare state.”

Dot Gibson of the National Pensioners Convention talks in the film of her optimism. “The older generation has an absolute duty to… start talking to young people about the vision of 1945,” she says. “How did we see it progressing? What does ‘from cradle to grave’ mean? Common ownership and sharing? We have a real chance to understand better what kind of life we want – and to start to rebuild.”

Loach says the left has always been fractured. “If you have a society where a large section believe they are not part of the political discourse, that is a situation for trouble. The Labour election of 1945 was a tremendous victory for democratic ownership of the economy. We need to remember and learn from the lessons.”

In the years immediately following the end of the second world war, the British public refused to return to the desperately unequal past. Loach’s film is mainly in black and white, except that the same images of exuberant street parties on VE Day that open the documentary are repeated at the end, in gloriously vivid Technicolor. Somehow what that captures superbly well and without sentimentality is that while the people had very little, they could celebrate that, in their grimmest times, their greatest asset had proven to be each other – and they had won.

The Spirit of ’45 opens in cinemas on 15 March. There will be a nationwide screening with a live Q&A with Ken Loach and special guests at 3pm on Sunday 17 March. See thespiritof45.com for more details and participating cinemas.

Briefings

Who’d have thought it?

<p>With a few notable exceptions, Scotland&rsquo;s local authorities have never been thought of as close allies of the community sector. &nbsp;All too often, it has been their actions and attitude that are cited as the main factor that inhibit communities from taking on more responsibility and more control over local affairs. Working at last week&rsquo;s COSLA conference, Lesley Riddoch thinks that she has spotted a discernible shift in the tectonic plates of the Scotland&rsquo;s local authority mind set.</p> <p>13/03/13</p>

 

Lesley Riddoch, 10th March 2013. Scotland on Sunday

 

HAS Scottish grassroots democracy found an unlikely champion?

Last week at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities conference in St Andrews, Nicola Sturgeon pledged Scotland’s councils would have their role enshrined in a written constitution after independence: currently, the UK and Scottish parliaments could both abolish local government outright.

The Deputy First Minister’s pledge prompted no immediate protestations of gratitude but then council chiefs aren’t expressive people, “respect” agendas are easily forgotten and most Cosla delegates oppose the constitutional destination of independence.

Later though, shadow Scottish secretary Margaret Curran agreed “local power can’t be at the whim of the centre” any longer and should have statutory support in a devolved Scotland. She cited constitutional guarantees in France and Denmark and concluded: “Scotland and the UK are currently out of step.”

In another life, supporters of genuine localism might have celebrated the spectacle of two powerful social democrats making common cause over the important principle of devolving power beyond Holyrood. In this life, of course, that is dismissed as wilfully naïve. Of course, both “sides” will promise the earth – say the cynics – but of course neither really means it. After all, the SNP has busily centralised public services like the police and fire brigade, while the Labour Party has central control in its bones.

Maybe. But I sense change is in the air – and not just because of pledges from national politicians. Genuine localism may finally have found a champion in the unlikely shape of Cosla. Come on, I hear you say. Cosla represents the interests of local government so how can it not champion local empowerment? Simple. Until now, local government and local empowerment have not meant the same thing – far from it.

“Local” in Scotland has come to mean a strategic, regional level of governance no other nation in Europe would recognise. The average council size in Scotland (162,000) for example, would create just two councils in Iceland where fierce debate recently reduced municipalities to a “measly” total of “just” 74.

Scotland has the largest council units, the smallest number of councillors, the least competitive elections, the smallest proportion of income raised locally and the lowest election turnouts in Europe. Only 22 per cent of Scots feel they can shape their local communities. Until recently, these “inconvenient truths” were simply noted by local and national politicians as they defended their own fiefdoms against attack from above.

But speech after speech at last week’s Cosla conference expressed an intention to empower communities as well. New Cosla president David O’Neill backed the Christie Commission argument – “you cannot ‘do’ health to people or communities, you must work with them” – and continued: “If the argument is that devolution doesn’t stop at Holyrood, then it doesn’t stop at existing local councils, either.”.

Cllr O’Neill said constitutional safeguards could turn “unequal tiers of government into equal spheres of responsibility” and create powerful “local” players to check the all-powerful, unicameral Holyrood government.

But if “the community” is also an equal sphere, what about entrenchment of its powers, proper funding and mandatory inclusion in joint public service delivery – or is community not that equal? I’ll grant you, the prospect of an extra layer of democracy is not a popular one – if it costs an extra taxpayer penny. And it will. But without structure and stability, how can the community sector connect with the super-annuated tiers of governance jostling for supremacy above?

Essentially, what’s happening now is a clash of the professional titans. The two biggest local budget-holders – NHS and councils – are being required to work, plan together and pool resources in Health and Social Care partnerships (HSCPs). It’s a move everyone backs in principle. Duplication meant 17 services were recently involved in the care of one unemployed mother. Old people regularly get stuck in hospital because the NHS has beds but the local social work department hasn’t cash for home adaptations. Shared budgets can end this – if territorialism, defensiveness and proceduralism are overcome.

There’s an incentive. According to Cosla chief executive Rory Mair, the Scottish Government will transfer responsibility to a single, central National Care Agency if HSCPs don’t work. 

Where, though, is the incentive to involve, empower or drive service delivery through community projects? The NHS and Scottish councils have a joint budget of £24 billion. Scotland’s 1,200 community councils have an average annual budget of £400 each and very few formal powers. Local Development Trusts have sprung up to manage assets like libraries, new housing and wind farms. Some have multi-million-pound turnovers, but most fundraise constantly to take on premises and services off-loaded by cash-strapped councils. Trusts are not elected by the whole community so party politics rarely interferes, but they can’t claim to formally represent “the whole community”.

Local government minister Derek Mackay says the forthcoming Community Empowerment and Renewal Bill will somehow square the circle. It must. If devolution and even independence are needed to protect Holyrood against the depredations of Westminster and constitutional entrenchment is promised to defend local government against Holyrood, then how can the community be “equal” but un-funded, un-entrenched and un-elected?

John Swinney told Cosla delegates it’s not good enough to put services first and think “it’s nice if they collide with people on our journey”. He spoke of “empowering people to become equal partners in service delivery”. Great stuff – but how?

The green shoots of recovery are starting to show in some of Scotland’s communities. Have central and local government leaders noticed, and if so, how will they respond?