Briefings

Small news, big news

April 4, 2023

As circulation numbers for national newspapers continue to dwindle, it seems that hyper-local news is on a very different trajectory. The independent community press serves a different purpose, reinforces local identity and aims to share the kind of  information and news that only means something to the local population. Usually run by volunteers and always on a shoestring, that lack of resource is often not reflected in the quality of finished product or the creativity involved. At last year’s UK wide Creative Lives awards, The Newstead News serving the tiny Borders village (circulation 350) scooped Scotland’s runner up prize.

 

Author: Creative Lives

Newstead is a small village located in the Borders, one of the most rurally remote regions of Scotland. It’s set on the banks of the River Tweed, in the shadow of the magical Eildon Hills.

During the early stages of the pandemic, Lisa Cowan volunteered her years of experience in the media and community development, to set up the Newstead News. Initially a small flyer, the publication has since grown. Published three times a year, the Newstead News is now a full-colour magazine delivered free to every home in the village.

Newstead has a population of just 350 people. With no pub or shop to help connect the community, the publication has become an important link. Over eight issues since 2020, the Newstead News has featured stories written by more than 35 individuals, with photographs captured from nearly 30. This includes children and young people who are encouraged to participate, along with older residents. Wider contributions to the publication have been made by even more members of the community and over 100 people have been involved so far.

The Newstead News covers everything from village issues and events, to local wildlife, films and science. The editorial direction is entirely led by the community. The publication offers residents and supporters of the village opportunities to become published writers and photographers. It’s become a runaway success achieved on no more than approximately £70 of funding each issue.

“Everyone has the chance to be creative, irrespective of age, background or skill,” says Lisa. “Between the pages of the Newstead News, there’s room for the whole community.”

 

Briefings

Shortlist My Place 

Scotland has an exceptionally rich built heritage and in recent years community groups have been seen to play an increasingly important role in the preservation and development of locally significant buildings and public realm. Scottish Civic Trust which seeks to help people connect with their built heritage recognises this contribution with the annual My Place Awards. The 2023 shortlist of community led built environment projects has just been announced with the ten contenders coming from Dumfries and Galloway (3), Argyll and Bute (3), Dundee, Perth and Kinross, South Lanarkshire and Scottish Borders. May the best building win.

 

Author: Scottish Civic Trust

Full shortlist of community led building projects

Short videos of shortlisted buildings

Scottish Civic Trust was set up in 1967, to help people connect to their built heritage and take a leading role in guiding its development. In its infancy, it successfully campaigned for the restoration of Edinburgh’s New Town, was instrumental in the revitalisation of New Lanark and can also claim credit for bringing Doors Open Days to the United Kingdom.

Through supporting amenity groups, the Trust’s original objectives were:

  • Well-informed public concern for the environment of town and country
  • High quality in planning and in new architecture
  • The conservation and, where necessary, adaptation for re-use of older buildings of distinction or historic interest
  • Knowledgeable and therefore effective comment in planning matters
  • The elimination of ugliness, whether resulting from social deprivation, bad design or neglect

Broadly speaking, we are still working towards the same objectives today.

Our 2023 My Place Awards received entries from community-led built environment projects across Scotland, and our judges have shortlisted six projects for further judging. They include an inclusive playpark, a converted station house, a bustling town square that was once a derelict lot, a vibrant community hub in what was once an at-risk building, a multi-purpose village hall in a remote area and a revitalised local park.

Learn more about the 2023 My Place Awards shortlisted projects by watching the short films below.

The winner of the 2023 My Place Awards will be announced at a ceremony on 24 April – be sure to follow us on Twitter to be kept in the loop!

Full shortlist of community led building projects

Short videos of shortlisted buildings

Briefings

Walking is not straightforward

The concept of the 20 minute neighbourhood has evolved from the experience of several major cities around the world with the best known being Melbourne. But as ever, the devil will be in the detail of its implementation and as the concept is now written into our national planning policy, it’s about time some of that detail started to emerge. Some useful work just published by Living Streets looking at it from a community perspective. And while the research showed that the theory had broad appeal, the reality of walking as a mode of transport is rather more complicated.

 

Author: Living Streets

20-minute neighbourhoods: a community perspective is published by Living Streets Scotland, part of the UK charity for everyday walking.

20-minute neighbourhoods are at the heart of Scotland’s fourth National Planning Framework. The concept – based on the idea that people can meet their essential needs within a 20-minute walk – is already popular in cities worldwide like Melbourne, Copenhagen, Paris and Utrecht for its potential to improve public health reinforce, economy as well as reducing carbon emissions from short car journeys.

The Living Streets Scotland report looks at the concept of 20-minute neighbourhoods, studies the evidence behind them, and asks whether they can be applicable in Scotland. The report follows a one-year research project that asked people in Stirling and North Lanarkshire how they travel within their local areas and what a 20-minute neighbourhood might look like for them. It also considered the barriers they currently experience when it comes to walking more.

Participants in the research commented on a lack of safe crossing points missing or and badly maintained pavements, and that pedestrian and disabled access can feel like “an afterthought”. The report recommends much better care and maintenance of local walking routes to make walking and wheeling a realistic and attractive option.

Stuart Hay, Director, Living Streets Scotland said:

“Creating safe, accessible and well-connected places will enable more of us to choose to walk or wheel our everyday journeys – helping to boost health, support local businesses and connect us to our local communities.

“Most people who drive report doing so because of the convenience, the lack of time to make another choice, or the necessity of using their car because the walking route is challenging or simply non-existent. While they like the idea of living locally and walking more, they still choose to drive. For 20-minute neighbourhoods to work, walking needs to become the easiest choice.

The report launches at Living Street Scotland’s Big Walking Seminar, which this year focuses on reducing traffic in car dominated places and is supported by Transport Scotland.

Briefings

Asking the wrong questions

With recent announcements from the Scottish Government of new private finance leveraging nature restoration schemes and even providing critical bridging finance for substantial land acquisitions, there’s a new queasiness about where this is all heading. And the latest climate science report (IPCC) only adds to a sense that we are seeking answers in all the wrong places. As Andy Wightman writes in Holyrood Magazine, fiddling around with carbon offsetting schemes does precisely nothing to actually reduce carbon emissions and if we think the answers to Scotland’s climate challenge lie with international financiers, we’re definitely asking the wrong question.  

 

Author: Andy Wightman, Holyrood Magazine

The Synthesis Report published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) earlier this month makes for grim reading. It concludes that limiting global warming to between 1.5 and two degrees involves rapid, deep and, in most cases, immediate greenhouse gas emission reductions. Limiting the global rise to 1.5 degrees is still possible, but only just and only if we act urgently to reduce emissions.

The challenges of reaching net zero demand a laser-like focus on reducing emissions fast. The other side of the net-zero calculus is capturing carbon from the atmosphere using natural methods such as afforestation or restoring wetlands and peatlands, and technological methods such as carbon capture and storage. The risk for policy makers is being seduced by apparent solutions that, ultimately, do little or nothing to reduce emissions. These include unproven technical fixes and also the current boom in carbon offsetting.

Carbon offsetting involves emitters acquiring credits from carbon sequestration projects to offset their own emissions. Not only will this have virtually no impact in the short and medium term, it is a huge distraction from doing what is effective in the immediate term – deep, rapid and immediate cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

All of which makes the latest initiative by Scotland’s nature agency, NatureScot, all the more bizarre. On 1 March, it announced a £2bn private finance pilot designed to secure landscape scale restoration of native woodlands. It is claimed that this £2bn of investment could create around 185,000 hectares of native woodland and sequester 28 million tCO2e over the next 30 years. 

It is the latest step in an unquestioning commitment to private finance to restore nature. At the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 14 March, government minister Lorna Slater claimed that the need for private finance for nature restoration is unquestioned, that there is absolute consensus on the question, and that the finance gap is £20bn.

There is a consensus on the need for private finance but there is in fact no consensus on how it should be deployed, on the role of carbon offsetting or on whether the so-called finance gap (the difference between money already committed by governments and what is deemed necessary to achieve net zero) is in fact £20bn.

This figure is frequently cited by government ministers with no critical engagement as to its accuracy. The figure comes from an organisation called the Green Finance Institute, a not-for-profit company wholly owned by the City of London Corporation and run by bankers which aims to develop opportunities for financial investment in a net-zero economy. 

The pilot project was launched by NatureScot in partnership with Hampden and Co, Palladium and Lombard Odier Asset Management Europe, three private financial companies. The aim of the project is to “catalyse private investment” at “significant scale” to deliver “high integrity carbon investment” and “maximise the benefits for nature and communities”.

Scotland’s land has a finite capacity for absorbing carbon and every tonne captured by trees and used to offset emissions is a tonne of carbon that is doing precisely nothing to reduce global temperatures. The 28 million tonnes of CO2e predicted to be sequestered will simply facilitate 28 million tonnes of CO2e emissions by the purchasers of the credits and contribute nothing to Scotland’s net-zero balance sheet.

As far as I can tell, there has been no analysis of the role that carbon offsetting should play in Scotland’s net-zero ambitions. This market is a voluntary market subject to no regulation and oversight and yet is now poised to drive significant private investment in land across Scotland. Financial corporation are already buying large tracts of land and concerns have been raised about inflated land prices, community benefits and how this carbon rush fits with the government’s land reform objectives.

In fact there are other ways of accelerating the restoration of nature that don’t depend on external capital from global investors. Existing landowners could be required to undertake defined minimum nature restoration projects. Restoring native forests could be accelerated by getting to grips with the over-grazing pressure from wild deer and managing sheep farming differently. Forthcoming agricultural support could insist on nature restoration in return for the receipt of public subsidy. 

And because the financial returns from forestry are already very lucrative, banning carbon offsetting will have little impact on the expansion of commercial forests across Scotland. 

Indeed, we should be supporting and rapidly expanding the industrial use of Scottish timber such as through the technology developed by Swedish company Modvion, which is working with the Finnish timber industry to manufacture engineered timber wind turbines and end the carbon-intensive use of steel. Those will be tonnes of carbon captured by trees and then stored as wind turbines producing green energy – a far better use of financial investment than carbon offsets.

Just as in the 1980s, when financial interests in London drove the afforestation of Caithness and Sutherland in an unregulated pursuit of short-term financial gains for already wealthy individuals, the current mania for carbon offsetting and the gold rush being promoted and facilitated by Scottish ministers and their nature agency is ill-thought through, potentially very damaging, and being promoted and developed with no scrutiny as to the potential negative impacts nor of the impact on Scotland’s net-zero targets.

If the answer to Scotland’s climate goals is to seek the involvement of City of London financiers, then we are almost certainly asking the wrong question.
 

 

Briefings

Watch ‘em dollar stores

The demise of the high street as the once vibrant heartbeat of our towns and villages has been a concern for years. But as the poundstretcher budget stores and payday lenders move into the empty shop units, they are usually regarded as a proxy for a wider downturn in the economy rather than being in any way directly responsible for the decline. Interesting report from the US which investigates the predatory behaviour of ‘Dollar Stores’ and which suggests twin action is required both from within the communities affected and from the government.

 

Author: Stacy Mitchell, Kennedy Smith, and Susan Holmberg

Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Family Dollar are targeting vulnerable communities, opening stores at a breakneck pace in urban and rural areas alike. It’s tempting to assume that these chains simply fill a need in cash-strapped places. But the evidence suggests that dollar stores are not merely byproducts of economic distress; they are a cause of it. Through predatory tactics, the dollar chains are killing off grocery stores and other local businesses, leaving communities with fewer jobs, diminished access to basic goods, and dimmer prospects for overall well-being.
As these losses mount, dollar stores are facing a rising tide of grassroots opposition. Over the last couple of years, scores of cities and towns have blocked the chains from opening new stores. Local action alone is not enough, however. Federal policymakers also need to address the ways in which misguided policies, particularly those governing antitrust and finance, are fueling the destructive proliferation of dollar stores.

Download the Report

 

Briefings

Cause for concern?

Whenever there’s a reshuffle at the top of the Scottish Government, it’s always a bit of guesswork  as to who’s been rewarded or blamed for whatever happened previously. Scotland's new First Minister’s recently announced team was always going to be more than a reshuffle and so there’s been even more speculation than usual about what it all means. And just as importantly, some analysis of what’s been left out of Ministerial portfolios. What conclusions should we draw from having to dig so far into the lists of ministerial duties for any mention of communities or even third sector?

 

Author: Scottish Government

Full ministerial team confirmed

Published 29 March 

Cabinet of 10 will be supported by 18 Junior Ministers.

First Minister Humza Yousaf has completed the appointment of his ministerial team. Consisting of 10 Cabinet Secretaries, including the First Minister, the Scottish Cabinet will be supported by 18 Junior Ministers.

First Minister Humza Yousaf

Minister for Drugs and Alcohol Policy Elena Whitham

Minister for Independence Jamie Hepburn

Minister for Cabinet and Parliamentary Business George Adam

Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Finance Shona Robison

Minister for Community Wealth and Public Finance Tom Arthur

Minister for Local Government Empowerment and Planning Joe FitzPatrick

Cabinet Secretary for NHS Recovery, Health and Social Care Michael Matheson

Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health Jenni Minto

Minister for Social Care, Mental Wellbeing and Sport Maree Todd

Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills Jenny Gilruth

Minister for Children, Young People and Keeping the Promise Natalie Don

Minister for Higher and Further Education; and Minister for Veterans Graeme Dey

Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Just Transition Màiri McAllan

Minister for Transport Kevin Stewart

Cabinet Secretary for Wellbeing Economy, Fair Work and Energy Neil Gray

Minister for Small Business, Innovation and Trade Richard Lochhead

Minister for Energy Gillian Martin

Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity (who will also work alongside the Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Just Transition) Lorna Slater

Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings, Active Travel and Tenants’ Rights (who will also work alongside the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice) Patrick Harvie

Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands Mairi Gougeon

Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture Angus Robertson

Minister for Culture, Europe and International Development Christina McKelvie

Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice Shirley-Anne Somerville

Minister for Equalities, Migration and Refugees Emma Roddick

Minister for Housing Paul McLennan

Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs Angela Constance

Minister for Victims and Community Safety Siobhian Brown

Parliament will be asked to approve the new Ministerial appointments on Thursday. A more detailed breakdown of ministerial responsibilities will be confirmed in due course.

 

Briefings

Seawilding

March 21, 2023

Until recently, the debate around rewilding has tended to polarise opinion, forcing a choice between people and the restoration of nature. In part this polarity has been exacerbated by some landowners pursuing their rewilding ambitions to the exclusion of the communities that might want to live there. The Scottish Rewilding Alliance is aiming to strike a new balance in this debate that seems both sensible and, most importantly, achievable. One aspect of their work is to highlight the key role that communities have in restoring balance to the natural environment both on land, and, in this instance, at sea.

 

Author: Scottish Rewilding Alliance

Great wee film..Rewilding Stories: Seawilding

While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it’s unlikely that an oyster is ever going to win the Bonnie Baby competition. Virtually colourless and often found plastered in mud, it struggles to hold a candle to many more ‘attractive’ molluscs.  But as they say, looks aren’t everything and there is more to the humble oyster than most of us might imagine.

Surprisingly, Ostrea edulis has much in common with the more charismatic Eurasian beaver. Like the beaver, the native oyster is a keystone species: an incredible ecosystem engineer, with the ability to help us restore abundance and diversity to Scotland’s seas. While the work of the beaver can help mitigate flooding and filter harmful chemicals through its extensive dam building, the oyster similarly filters huge amounts of water – more than 200 litres every day. It removes pollutants, chemicals, effluent and particulate matter, and like beavers, oysters help sequester carbon, as well as creating complexity in their environment through their intricate three-dimensional reefs, which provide sanctuary for a vast array of marine life. 

Once found all around our coastline, oysters have been over-used and abused, their fragile habitat dredged and trawled to the point where they are now endangered. While giant pandas and tigers grab the conservation headlines, the plight of this non-descript but essential mollusc goes largely un-noticed.

So, what can be done to reverse the tragic demise of this marine treasure? People power is the short answer. Nestling south of the vibrant port of Oban, a small rural community on the Craignish peninsula is well aware of the oyster’s potential.  In 2016, concerned about the effects of over-fishing, dredging and plastic pollution in the glorious but susceptible Loch Craignish, a group of volunteers formed the Craignish Restoration of Marine and Coastal Habitats, or CROMACH for short. The group aims to promote and protect the surrounding marine environment and top of their ‘to do’ list is the return of native oysters to the sea loch.

The area has been designated as a ‘Hope Spot’, the first of its kind in Scotland. Established by Mission Blue, an organisation led by the legendary oceanographer Dr Sylvia Earle, Hope Spots are special places identified as critical to the health of the planet’s oceans. The Gulf of California is a Hope Spot; so too the Sargasso Sea and the Maldive Atolls. The Argyll Coast & Islands sits alongside the great and the good of the world’s marine ecosystems.

Antonia Baird, the enthusiastic Chair of CROMACH, grew up here. “My family have been here for generations and I know how glorious it is, but we also know we need to look after what we have. We heard about oysters and we knew there was still a tiny population in the loch, but when we understood what they could do for our seas, everyone was immediately on board.” 

In 2019, following a series of meetings, presentations and school visits, CROMACH secured a small SeaChangers grant to cover a pilot study into the feasibility of returning these native bivalves to the loch. 

“There’s a baffling amount of red tape and bureaucracy, but eventually we secured a licence and worked closely with NatureScot to ensure that biosecurity protocols were followed.” Antonia smiles before continuing. “We then introduced a thousand tiny baby oysters into specialised cages. They did well, and the project for a large-scale reintroduction was born.” 

CROMACH is an eclectic mix of people of all ages, united by a strong connection to this place. “There are many important players who have made this possible – too many to mention – but it needed a driving force and Danny Renton, or Mr Oyster as we now call him, is that force. We could not have come this far without him.”

A grant from the National Lottery Heritage Fund meant that a five-year project could kick off to grow 1 million juvenile oysters in specialist floating cages. Once mature they will be translocated to trial seabed sites around Loch Craignish. 

“It’s incredibly exciting,” Antonia explains. “All the bits interlock nicely both ecologically but also from a community perspective. Our members range from academics to hands-on volunteers, to primary school children, yachtsmen and visitors, some of whom have been coming here for years. Everyone feels a part of this.” 

Ardfern seems idyllic on a hot August day with not a midge in sight. It’s a village that still has a school, and a village shop – increasingly rare in a world of change. Before meeting Mr Oyster, I chat with another driving force, the charismatic wildlife photographer and guide Philip Price, who has been in the thick of this since its conception. He, his artist wife and their triplets lead a mainly green existence – growing their own fruit and vegetables, and getting about on an electric bike, with a capacious trailer that Philip uses to transport clients to his wildlife hides. “We needed a united community voice to help us make vital decisions on how we use our seas. We want to have the power to say ‘stop’ to unsustainable fishing and development, because we won’t get a second chance” says Philip, a passionate advocate for all aspects of rewilding.  

Danny is as equally charming and charismatic and although widely recognised as the instigator of the oyster reintroduction, he is quick to point out the key role of others. “John Hamilton of Lochnell Oysters has advised us and helped us all the way. He designed and developed the ‘oyster hoisters’ to hang under the marina pontoons at the Ardfern Yacht Centre. Each hoister houses thirty mature oysters all of which will release spat. Yacht owners can sponsor a hoister and become active stakeholders. In this way, they can put something back into the marine environment.”

Oysters fascinate children and Danny’s own charity Seawilding, has partnered with Heart of Argyll Wildlife, a local environmental group run by Pete Creech and Oly Hemmings, who will be working with primary-aged children drawn from five local schools. They will record weather, sea condition and temperature, and gather data on the oyster’s growth rates. They will examine predation and mortality levels, while also studying the other creatures that share the oyster’s space. The presence of non-native marine species, perhaps introduced on boat hulls, will also be logged. “We’ve rented a room in the Craignish Hall opposite the marina so on bad weather days after looking at the oysters and seeing their progress, we can run our workshops for the children there. This is great for engaging the children, but it’s also an important citizen science project,” Pete Creech tells me.

Students from the Scottish Association of Marine Sciences (SAMS) as well as from Stirling University’s School of Aquaculture will also monitor the project’s progress once the young oysters have become established on the seabed. Alongside several other restoration projects across the UK, the data gathered will feed into the wider effort to restore oyster reefs.

Danny and I head to the shoreline. Loch Craignish is as smooth as silk, clear as gin and fringed by swathes of purple loosestrife, yellow hawkweed and meadowsweet. Bees and grasshoppers thrum and tick. We drag a small boat down across a patch of yellow sand, and Danny rows us out to the newly established oysters drifting in cages off a small island, Eilean Buidhe. 

They have been out here now for three weeks. After two years in the planning, 60,000 juvenile oysters, the size of a thumbnail, arrived from a Morecombe Bay hatchery. It was a great moment.  Finally, Scotland’s first community-led marine habitat restoration project was underway.

 The oars click and splash as we chat and quickly reach the floating baskets. Danny pulls one up – seaweed festoons the container. The oarsman carefully takes a handful of little oysters from their refuge. 

“Look at this, they’ve grown already – see that pelmet around the shell, that’s new growth. In the next five years, we hope to put in a million young oysters. When they are around the size of a 50p piece, we will return them to the seabed having first located safe sites that have been surveyed by divers.” 

But his brown weather-beaten face creases with concern.  

“Ultimately, if this is to succeed, we need a Marine Protected Area for Loch Craignish for community-led research and habitat restoration. We need to keep the scallop dredgers out as they can destroy our work in minutes.”

Danny is ambitious and highly driven. He would like to see the eventual establishment of a sustainable local fishery. “It would provide jobs, and we could grow other things – seaweed, and mussels – a regenerative polyculture. If we can take people with us, the model we are creating is infinitely replicable elsewhere. It’s a project that could be rolled out all around Scotland. People are increasingly aware of what is happening on land, but not at sea. Many local fisheries are dead or dying but rather than simply lament that, we want to do something positive.” He smiles as he returns the baby oysters to their floating home, and then rows us gently back to the beach.

I think of a favourite quote by Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”  Beautiful Loch Craignish is rightly a Hope Spot. And hope is what we need. 

 

Briefings

‘Anarchist’ Minister calls off sale 

Revealing outburst from a prospective purchaser of Kinloch Castle on Rum, accusing Green Party MSP Lorna Slater of being an ‘anarchist minister’. The building has long been a headache (financially and strategically) for its current owners, NatureScot, who were keen to offload. But the multimillionaire’s plans never aligned with the interests of Rum’s small community nor apparently, were they ever shared directly with them. And so Ms Slater called the whole deal off. And what’s to become of Kinloch Castle? An idea to allow the castle to decay as a curated ruin is being considered.  

 

Author: Xander Elliards, Sunday National

A MULTIMILLIONAIRE Brexiteer has dropped his bid to buy a small Hebridean island’s iconic castle.

Jeremy Hosking – a key donor to Laurence Fox’s controversial Reclaim Party who is reportedly worth some £375 million – had been in talks to purchase Kinloch Castle on Rum from a Scottish Government agency.

But locals had warned the sale represented an “existential threat” to the small island community of around 40 people, and called for another solution to be found for the empty site.

The castle is owned by NatureScot, formerly called Scottish Natural Heritage, which has said it is a drain on its funding. The agency has said there is an option to let it “decline and ruin”, warning this will “still come at a cost to the public purse of around £1m”.

It had been in talks with Hosking about selling the castle, which he hoped to turn into a hotel business.

However, the sale was put on hold in November by Scottish Greens minister Lorna Slater after lobbying from locals.

Slater said the Government was keen to find a solution that eased the funding burden on NatureScot and also worked for the Rum community.

On Saturday, Hosking (below) said that he no longer wanted to be involved in the project, telling the Daily Mail that it was Slater’s fault.

He said: “This is not about money — I don’t want to be participating in this process because it is so horrible.

“I understand it is the minister that decides and it’s her prerogative, but her actions have consequences. I’m not prepared to be pushed around any more. They have to find another buyer.

“I have tried to speak to Miss Slater but got no reply. Enough is enough.

“Of course I am handing the anarchy head [a reference to Slater’s governmental department] this great victory because we are now back to where we were five years ago, and the castle is five years older. And it’s the Greens who have completely crushed a conservation project. It’s unbelievable.”

But the Isle of Rum Community Trust (IRCT) thanked Slater for her “invaluable” support through the process – and questioned why they had learned of Hosking’s withdrawal through the newspapers and not been told “in a more conventional manner”.

The trust said it was “disappointing” that the multimillionaire had dropped his bid, but went on: “However, it is perhaps never a good sign of things to come if a prospective major player in the life of our island chooses to communicate repeatedly with this community, on subjects of such importance, by these means [through the newspapers], rather than in a more conventional manner.

“Indeed, dialogue with Mr Hosking and his representatives has rarely felt full, open and constructive and we feel vindicated in our concerns that this may have had negative implications for any future working relationships had the sale gone ahead.”

It went on: “The Isle of Rum Community Trust have worked hard to ensure that any sale must represent a good deal for the community who live on Rum. Over the last eight months, we have made a number of, we feel, reasonable requests to the proposed buyer (and the seller) relating to the possible positive and negative impacts on Rum of these proposals. None of these have been substantially answered. This has been unfortunate.”

The trust said it would continue to look for a “sustainable future for the castle site which will deliver benefits to everyone on Rum and to the agendas of community empowerment and engagement, land reform, environment and net zero, as well as that of heritage.”

Kinloch Castle has a chequered history and is seen as a symbol of the excessive wealth and greed of the days of empire.

It was constructed by George Bullough, the playboy son of textile magnate John Bullough, from 1897-1900. His father had bought the island as a hunting estate in 1888.

Rum had been inhabited since ancient times but saw its population of some 400 cleared out to make room for sheep in the early 1800s. After the sheep farm went bust, it was sold to the Conservative politician James Gascoyne-Cecil in 1845. It was Gascoyne-Cecil who sold it to Bullough.

Locals has raised concerns that a sale to Hosking could see similar aristocratic-style ownership of the island, saying that they “cannot compete with the power that many millions of pounds bring with it”.

The English businessman was ranked 351 on the Sunday Times Rich List in 2019. He has donated to the Tories, to Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party, and millions to Laurence Fox’s Reclaim Party.

 

Briefings

Work may have to change

The Chancellor’s recent budget made great play of measures to remove barriers to the labour markets - be that the cost of childcare, pension disincentives for the wealthiest 1% or changes to Universal Credit. It coincided with my first sight of Chatbox GPT and a demonstration of all that is coming our way faster than mere human intelligence can imagine. If nothing else, our conception of work is going to have to change. Which of course strengthens the case for a Universal Basic Income. Interesting piece arguing for a Participation Income and how it could help communities fight climate change.

 

Author: Heikki Hiilamo

Universal Basic Income (UBI), a programme in which all adult citizens are given a regular amount of money to spend on what they choose, dominates the debate on the future of social policy. It is based on the idea that in the middle of plenty, millions of people still suffer from unemployment, underemployment, and a lack of means to have a meaningful life, and that a regular grant will provide a basic threshold to guarantee a certain quality of life.

Basic income schemes have already been piloted in Finland, Canada, Los Angeles in the US, and Wales, among others. And many countries have dealt with the social protection gap in hard times by providing temporary cash transfers with no strings attached, as happened in response to COVID-19 in Japan, South Korea and the US.

While arguments still continue over the predicted impact of new digital technologies on employment as a result of increasing automation, there is a pressing crisis that also calls for radical changes in social policy: the climate emergency.

Wellbeing not economic growth

Welfare regimes all rely on the dividend of future productivity growth to underwrite increases in welfare spending. Even if economic growth could be decoupled from emissions, this is unlikely to happen fast enough to arrest global warming between 1.5 and 2°C, which scientists estimate is necessary to avert catastrophic changes.

There is fledgling research on new models of a welfare state which is not built on productivity and economic growth, but upon an architecture of sustainable wellbeing and care. UBI is the best known alternative to traditional welfare states. But it fails to meet the challenge for building a sustainable and just society.

Getting “free” money on its own won’t encourage people to use less fossil energy and do less of the things currently driving climate change. UBI schemes also consider monetary income as the route to meeting basic needs, strengthening the role of money in everyday life and leaving existing social relations untouched. Such schemes might entice politicians to cut resources from public services.

UBI does not fit well with the call for a more interventionist state to grapple with the climate emergency either. It is based on the idea of an individual right to income without recognising the value of common action or reciprocal behaviour. Claimants may withdraw from the community and never explore their full potential as community members.

Participation income

The original participation income model (PI) was proposed by the British economist Anthony Atkinson in 1996. It is similar to UBI, but obliges people to do something in exchange for the money they receive. These activities can contribute to both the capacity of the community or the individual, like care work or attending language courses. For the most part, claimants know best what activities would be appropriate, and it would allow them to engage in a reciprocal relationship with society.

These activities could include gardening or tree planting, essentially anything that involves restoring biodiversity and bolstering natural solutions to climate change. And it can even replace or be integrated into current labour market policy measures which aim to equip unemployed persons with new skills to reenter work.

PI does have some weaknesses which need to be overcome. Atkinson envisioned nearly every person in society being eligible for the scheme, as monitoring eligibility would be difficult and incur hefty administrative costs. The PI model could be revised so that the payment reaches people on low incomes who currently rely on means-tested benefits.

Some people will also choose not to take part in participatory activities, but they must not be allowed to slip through the net. If PI was given as a “top-up” to a guaranteed minimum income, receiving PI would be seen as positive and losing it could not be regarded as a sanction.

Importantly, if the participatory activities were imposed upon people, they would remain in a subordinate position and may be stuck doing similar duties repeatedly. Allowing PI recipients to choose their activities would let them decide how to enrich their own lives and the life of their community. This model could involve community-based organisations, public providers and local residents’ networks in planning a range of development projects.

Innovative models of social security are especially important for people who may not be able to find green jobs, or households and communities with limited resources, who may not have the time or money to adopt energy-saving technologies or a climate-friendly diet.

PI is no panacea, but it could be useful for helping build a welfare state model fit for the 21st century.

Briefings

More transparency needed

Interesting open letter from Andrew Thin of Scottish Land Commission to Jeremy Leggat, the driving force behind Highland Rewilding which has described the recent purchase of Tayvallich estate as being the next best thing to community ownership. In amongst the praise for Highland Rewilding’s open and engaging approach, two big messages were contained - concerns at the continuing trend towards ever more concentrated patterns of ownership and the speculative financial models being applied. Land reform campaigner, Peter Peacock calls for much more transparency about the public subsidies being trousered by Scotland’s largest landowners.

 

Author: Peter Peacock

The top 100 landowners in Scotland should be named in a “rich list” which shows how much public money they get, according to a former government minister.

Peter Peacock’s plan includes demands for an inquiry into the level of government handouts to already-wealthy estate owners.

The land reform campaigner, who served as education minister in Jack McConnell’s Holyrood administration, was one of the first prominent figures to call for action over “green lairds”.

This new generation of landowners is accused of sending land prices rocketing while scrambling to cash-in on government grants and tax breaks for planting trees, restoring peatland and other work to help meet climate change targets.

Mr Peacock, a former Highland Council convener, says many people have become “very rich” as a result of rising land values, and are “growing richer by the day” because they are also being handed huge subsidies.

‘Time for a full investigation’

He said: “It is time for a full investigation into how many millions of public subsidies is being given to the top 100 private landowners every year and by just how much the value of their land has grown at the same time.

“It seems wrong for hard-pressed taxpayers to be subsidising some very wealthy people and corporate bodies, with no opportunity to share in the rapidly rising value of their land assets.”

He said local communities are now priced out of the Scottish land market.

“As a result, it seems it is only the super-rich that can now buy big areas of land and then watch its value grow and grow,” he added.

“Meanwhile lots of ordinary people who would love a bit of land to work, to grow trees for climate benefit for example can’t get that opportunity because the market is cornered by the super-rich.”

Mr Peacock fears the growth of the community ownership movement is “stalling” because land prices are soaring.

Rich list

“We need to shed light on the issues and create a land rich list as a prelude to significant reform and redirecting public spending in land to where it can produce shared benefits, not grow private wealth,” he said.

“The Scottish Government could launch an investigation into this, or it is something the Scottish Parliament could do, and the sooner the better.”

About 400 owners are estimated to control half of all Scotland’s privately owned land

Land Reform minister Mairi McAllan has said the Scottish Government is “fully committed” to tackling the adverse effects of scale and concentration of landownership, while “empowering communities in the process”.

The Scottish Government held a consultation on a new land reform bill between July and October last year, receiving more than 540 responses.

It is proposed that the Bill, which is due to be introduced by the end of this year, will strengthen rules around public subsidies, including a threat of losing funding if tougher regulations are flouted.

There could also be a requirement that the land related to a subsidy claim be registered in the Land Register of Scotland.

Many campaigners want the government to go further, including capping the amount of land that can be owned by one individual or company.

Private investment

Stephen Young, head of policy at Scottish Land & Estates, said the focus should be on using land productively to address the climate crisis, not simply who owns it.

“Many environmental and agricultural schemes to support government policies require substantial private investment,” he said.

“In many cases, without an element of public funding to sit alongside, such projects would be simply unviable.

“There is ample room for private, community, charity and public landownership and it should not be the case that ownership models are pitted against each other.”

Mr Young said that communities and individuals should have the opportunity to use, own and manage land, but that investing at scale can also be of huge benefit.

“Community owners have been on record themselves as acknowledging the advantages of managing land at scale and fragmentation of ownership will make it more difficult to undertake carbon sequestration projects at a landscape level,” he said.

Peatland restoration work on the Mar Estate. Image: Media House International.

A Scottish Government spokesman said it had a “clear” commitment to supporting and increasing community ownership of land and assets.

“Through Community Rights to Buy and the Scottish Land Fund, which will be doubled to £20m by 2026, more communities than ever across Scotland are taking ownership of local buildings and assets,” he said

“The number of assets known to be in community ownership has increased eightfold over the past 20 years, and there is now almost four times as much community owned land compared to the year 2000.

“These sustained upwards trends show real progress and delivery of the Scottish Government’s ambitions for land reform.

“The consultation on our ambitious Land Reform Bill meanwhile included a range of proposals, including a public interest test on large scale land transfers and a new requirement for those seeking land-based subsidies to have their land registered in the Land Register, to ensure transparency around who benefits from public funding.

“This is the next step on Scotland’s land reform journey as we continue the work to pass more power to people and local communities, encourage and support responsible and diverse landownership and ensure communities have a say in how land in is used.”