Briefings

Map your town centre

March 11, 2015

<p>Back in 2012, Scottish Government announced that regeneration should, wherever possible, be community led.&nbsp; This was easier said than done given that past practice had been quite the reverse, with external agencies and local authorities holding on tightly to the regeneration reins. Shifting old habits was always going to take time, but there are some encouraging signs. The recent launch of an Asset Mapping Fund to help development trusts working on town centre regeneration being an example.</p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

Towns across the South of Scotland will be able to bid for new funding to help them find ways to develop empty and underused properties in their areas, Social Justice Secretary Alex Neil has announced.

The new £50,000 Asset Mapping Funding Pot will give development trusts the chance to conduct surveys, work with stakeholders and consult with their communities on the best methods of rejuvenating their town centres.

Commenting, SNP MSP Aileen McLeod said: “Our towns should be vibrant, attractive and safe places where local people and visitors want to spend their time and money.

“This ambition can be blighted by neglected or derelict buildings and very often communities themselves have innovative ideas for how these eyesores could be put to much better use.

“The first step for any such proposal is to find out more about the building itself and whether it can really contribute to community regeneration – and if there is community support for a proposal. This funding is designed to support that activity.

“This region has many active and successfully community initiatives and community development trusts, many of which now have valuable direct experience of taking on community assets and contributing to regeneration.

“I look forward to seeing how the Trusts who are successful in their bids, use the funding pot to develop plans which will help to prioritise support for local assets, which will then attract new uses, new business and revitalise local economy.”

Briefings

Digital divide widens

<p>Glasgow&rsquo;s health profile is something of an unexplained phenomena amongst public health professionals. The experts claim that while high concentrations of poverty are a contributory factor, something else is at work which they don&rsquo;t fully understand.&nbsp; And it seems that health is not the only measure in which Glasgow lags behind the rest of the country. While 24% of the UK population have no online presence, in Glasgow this figure stands at 40%.&nbsp; As society becomes ever more digitally dependent, this level of disconnect becomes much more than a technical issue.</p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

Author: Carnegie UK

Glasgow experiences some of the highest levels of digital exclusion in the UK. What are the key barriers citizens face to getting online? How do these vary by demographic group? What might be the most effective solutions for increasing digital participation in the city? And how can other towns, cities and communities from across the UK learn from the challenges and the solutions in Glasgow?

To view the report from Carnegie UK click here

Briefings

How to win the general election

<p><span>For the next 8 weeks, each political party will be out to woo voters with all manner of promises and pledges. These policy propositions will all be tailored to appeal to specifically targeted groups of voters &ndash; often relatively small numbers - without alienating their core vote. Recent research by Carnegie suggests there is one policy idea that some 14.5 million voters have identified as being a key vote winner. Now that&rsquo;s got to be worth ripping up a manifesto for.</span></p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

Devolving power over local services and local decision making could be a crucial vote winner for as many as 14.5 million voters* in this year’s General Election, according to new research released today by the Carnegie UK Trust.

One in three UK voters (32%) say they would vote for the political party that offered them more control over the public services that they receive. With a tight election predicted, championing the devolution of power to constituents could have a significant impact on the final result.  

There was some variation according to region. Respondents from the key battle grounds of the Midlands and the North of England were less likely to feel they had enough control over local services. Perhaps reflecting a feeling of disconnection with Westminster in the English regions, Bradford East, a 365 Liberal Democrat majority and Chesterfield, a Labour seat with just a 549 majority could both, potentially be influenced by a pledge for more local control.

Martyn Evans, Chief Executive, Carnegie UK Trust said: “In an unpredictable and tight General Election race, marginal seats could be won or lost on a persuasive campaign that promises more powers for communities and individuals. Up to 14 million voters could be swayed by such a promise.”

“People want to feel a far greater sense of control over the public services they use every day. The party that offers a more enabling form of government could win out.

The Carnegie UK Trust poll revealed that younger voters in particular are persuaded by the promise of a more enabling state, 37% of 18 -24 year olds and 38% of 25-34 year olds said that they would vote for the party that offered them greater control over the public services that they and their community received.  

Martyn Evans added: “Young people are particularly receptive to the offer of greater control. Our research suggests a huge proportion of young people will vote for policies that devolve power back into local communities.”

National and devolved government policies such as the Localism Act have on the face of it offered individuals and communities a more active role in public services and decision making. However, most people polled by the Carnegie UK Trust (61%) felt that they had no more control over how public services are designed and delivered in their area than they did five years ago, with a further 29% suggesting their local decision making powers had actually diminished in that timeframe.

Martyn Evans added: “Of course just because individuals and communities are seeking more control does not mean that they wish to be involved in every detail of public service delivery and design. There are some areas of public service delivery where more control genuinely offers greater benefits and others were people are happy to devolve control to professionals.”

The ICM online poll of 2,000 nationally representative GB residents aged 18+ was conducted on behalf of the Carnegie UK Trust, which has been exploring the shift toward a more enabling state: the changing relationship between the state, citizens and communities in the UK can successfully give communities and individuals can have more control over their own wellbeing and the public services that they receive.  

 ————————————————————————————————————————–

Key results:

•32% of people polled would be persuaded to vote for a political party that offered them more control over the public services that they receive.

•When people were asked whether they felt like they had too much, too little or the right amount of control over public services that they received. Over half (55%) felt that they had too little. This was true regardless of social class or geography 1 .

•Respondents aged 55 or older in particular, felt that they had too little control over public services (for example 63% of respondents aged 55-64 felt that they had too little control compared with 49% of 18-24 year olds). 

•Most people (61%) said that the degree of control they had over how public services are designed and delivered in their area had remained unchanged over the last five years. 29% felt that they had less control.

 

•Respondents from the South East and West, Wales and Scotland were more likely to report that they had more control over public services now compared to 5 years ago than respondents from the Midlands and the North of England.

 

•When respondents were asked which areas of public service delivery that they thought could be improved by involving local people more in design and delivery the most frequently selected options were social care and local planning and development (45 % of respondents) in contrast just 9% of respondents felt that defence could be improved by giving local people more control.

•When it comes to their own personal quality of life, respondents consistently rated their own personal capacity and their family, friends and the community that they live in as having by far the biggest influence on their quality of life regardless of social class.

 1 With the exception of respondents in social class C2 respondents more than 50% of respondents from all social classes said that they would like more control.

Briefings

One small step

<p>The community buy out of <a href="http://www.machrihanish.org/">Machrihanish Airbase</a> was one of the largest and most complicated yet. Four years of negotiations finally concluded in 2012 with the purchase from MOD of the base for the princely sum of &pound;1. It&rsquo;s a huge site with all manner of unusual buildings which the community are gradually bringing back into productive use. It&rsquo;s also got 10,000 feet of runway which not only makes it one of the longest in Europe but also well placed to accommodate the next generation of space travellers.</p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

Author: BBC

The UK government has issued a shortlist of aerodromes that could host a UK spaceport. The list reduces the number of runways first suggested as candidates when last year’s consultation got under way.

Still in are Campbeltown (Machrihanish), Glasgow Prestwick, and Stornoway in Scotland; Newquay in England and Llanbedr in Wales. RAF Leuchars is confirmed as a potential temporary facility. Ministers are keen to see the spaceport established by 2018.

To make that happen, they will also have to put in place the necessary regulatory and licensing arrangements. The government has ruled out two airfields in the consultation: RAF Lossiemouth and Kinloss Barracks in Scotland. The decision was made for operational defence reasons, it said.

The emphasis will be on the expected emergence of a new breed of low-cost rocket planes that can launch fare-paying passengers to sub-orbital altitudes and also satellites into orbit.

Most of potential vehicles are still quite some time away from flying, but ministers believe that if the UK gets its act together now, the nation can catch the first wave when it arrives.

Precisely where the British spaceport would be sited will depend on a number of factors, but the overriding imperative of the licensing authorities will be to find a location that limits danger and inconvenience to the general public.

That is why the six potentials listed are all on the coast: the spaceplanes could then operate out over water.

Even so, the environmental impacts will have to be carefully managed, and an opening found in Britain’s highly congested airspace (more than two million flights transit UK airspace every year).

Aviation minister Robert Goodwill said in a statement: “I want Britain to lead the way in commercial spaceflight. Establishing a spaceport will ensure we are at the forefront of this exciting new technology.

“Today’s consultation response marks another step forward in our work to support this emerging industry, which will create jobs and drive economic growth.”

Briefings

Share the burden

<p>In the grand schemes of things, community involvement with renewable energy is still in its relative infancy. Nonetheless, it&rsquo;s a fast moving sector and many windows of opportunity that gaped open just a few years ago have already slammed shut. But new opportunities are always coming along and those who are prepared to innovate and be open to new possibilities can still succeed. The mantra used to be that 100% community ownership was the only way to go. Why so, asked Lesmahagow. Why not spread the risk with those that can afford it?</p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

A wind farm in South Lanarkshire has received more than £8m in funding.

The three-turbine project near the village of Lesmahagow could generate enough electricity to power the equivalent of more than 300 homes.

The wind farm is jointly owned by Stewart Energy Ltd and Lesmahagow Development Trust (LDT).

It has received £1.63m from Scottish Enterprise along with a £6m loan and a £500,000 VAT facility from Santander Corporate and Commercial.

The Scottish Enterprise money has come from its renewable energy investment fund (REIF).

LDT is planning to use income from the wind farm to fund projects such as community groups, regeneration of buildings and the purchase of community assets such as sports facilities.

‘Passionate believer’

Energy minister Fergus Ewing said: “The Scottish government remains ambitious for Scotland’s tremendous green energy potential and its ability to transform local communities.

“We continue to lead the way in supporting local and community ownership of renewable energy, most recently through our Community Energy Empowerment programme, which will make it easier for community groups to follow LDT’s example and take a stake in a renewable energy scheme.”

Andrew Stewart, director at Stewart Energy Ltd, said: “I am a passionate believer in renewable energy and the benefits projects like ours can bring to our area if 100% of the ownership is kept local.

“We had always planned to gift the Lesmahagow Development Trust with a stake in the wind farm project but with the establishment of REIF the trust was able to secure a much larger stake.

“We look forward to working closely with Santander and the Scottish government to ensure the project is completed on time.”

Briefings

A step change for food justice

<p>In her book This Changes Everything, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/06/dont-look-away-now-the-climate-crisis-needs-you">Naomi Klein</a>&nbsp;describes how so many of us are effectively complicit in climate change denial. We read the compelling evidence but then employ all manner of tactics to justify inaction.&nbsp; Or we look momentarily at the problem but then turn away, simply because we can. But for millions, turning away is no longer an option.&nbsp; It seems we may have a similar pattern of response to the scandal of food poverty in this country. Last week, a packed gathering in Govan took the first steps towards a society beyond food banks.&nbsp;</p> <p>11/3/15</p>

 

In Glasgow on Saturday the seeds were sown for a food justice movement in Scotland.

Hear some of the voices from the event here

Govan, birthplace of people’s political activism in this country, hosted a Church of Scotland organised event – in collaboration with the Centre for Human Ecology and Faith in Community Scotland – exploring how sustainable food equality can be achieved.

Over 200 people – community food growing experts, activists, food bank volunteers – shared their experience of tackling the growing crisis of food access decline in one of the richest countries in the world.

Rev Sally Foster-Fulton, Convener of the Church and Society Council, said: “This has been an incredible day. It is the beginning of a movement. It was not about coming together and just talking about food banks. It was about finding ways for sustainable food justice in Scotland. We have brought a lot of people here who are on the ground day in day out. They have expertise on how we can move this crisis response forward and achieve fair access to food for all. Change has begun.”

The keynote speaker at the conference was Rachel Gray, executive director of The Stop Community Food Centre in Canada.

She shared the experience of over 35 years of food banks in Canada and how her organisation has evolved the food bank format to help people increase their dignity, health and challenge inequality.

She said: “We know that food banks don’t work at addressing poverty. We hope very much that Scotland will take a firm stand on this issue. That it will look at the consequences of not investing in food security and see the devastation that poverty will cause to the health of the nation.”

Community food growth, political activism, enshrinement of the right to food in Scots Law, alternative food production systems and ensuring the word ‘food bank’ did not become entrenched in the national consciousness were among the array of ideas being shared.

The task now is to channel this desire for change into action. In the second half of 2015 the Church of Scotland will convene a follow-up event – Beyond Foodbanks 2 – to further root the movement and focus on the details necessary for success.

Briefings

Transform the system

February 25, 2015

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>A recent edition of Local People Leading featured the work of Prof. John Seddon and his ideas about how systems theory could transform public services. Judging by the response to that piece, many people think his proposals are an important step in the right direction. Scottish Government has committed a huge amount of money to the cause public service reform. Here&rsquo;s hoping some of it finds its way in the direction of Seddon&rsquo;s work. Here are 10 things you could do to get things rolling in your organisation.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal">25/2/15</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Ella Hunter, New Start Magazine

New Start Magazine sponsored a special edition on how system change might be applied to see the rest of this publication click here

10 ways to change a system:

1.            Put a shelf life on your organisation. Most organisations aimed at social change grow over time and often get further away from the problem they were set up to solve. MAC-UK – an organisation ensuring that deprived young people have access to mental health services – has given itself a ten-year shelf life to ensure that its focus is on embedding its ideas into practice rather than on running and building another organisation.

2.            Seed a movement not an organisation. The Transition Town movement works like a virus, infecting people to come together to create greater resilience in their local communities. It has a template for change that new groups can take on and adapt as they see fit. Likewise, the Civic Systems Lab creates ‘platforms’ through which civic change can happen.

3.            Be ‘of’ the community. Paternalism is still alive and kicking in many organisations that are unable to shake off the hierarchies and power structures that arise when one group of people tries to help another. But organisations likeBarca in Leeds and the WomenCentre take people and community as the starting point from which their work flows. Time banks and appreciative enquiry help to level hierarchies.

4.            Focus on root causes not symptoms. Most social problems are symptoms of deeper issues, be they structural inequalities in society or deep-seated problems within a person. While it is important to deal with the symptoms that manifest themselves – be they substance abuse or homelessness – this needs to be combined with a focus on tackling the roots of the issue and the systems keeping those problems in place.

5.            Collaborate around a problem, leaving organisational egos behind. Many blame middle managers for putting up barriers to change. As people move up hierarchies within organisations and become more specialised they often find it difficult to think outside of their rigid professional boundaries. But space can be created to allow staff to think without their organisational hats on. Monmouthshire Council is creating space and time to build innovation into its structures.

6.            Focus on people’s capabilities and assets not their deficits. As our leaders and media scapegoat and stigmatise vulnerable people, we need organisations that see the person not the label. Leeds Gate is improving the quality of life for gypsy and Irish traveller communities.

7.            Scale values not organisations. The organisational structure is often not the best vehicle through which to create change. It is sometimes more powerful to practice and nurture strong values that change behaviour. Julie Fawcett turned around the run-down Stockwell Park estate and transformed the lives of countless young people by spreading the values of ‘love, tolerance and forgiveness’.

8.            Leave behind the safety blanket of professional methods and learn something new. In Lambeth Council staff members who spent part of their working week talking to citizens at the Open Works shop set up on a local high street, said that the experience had fundamentally changed the way they did their jobs. A team of child and adult health and social workers called Love Barrow Families has overturned the way it works to put itself truly at the service of families in need.

9.            Listen. At Barca in Leeds they practice ‘active listening’ to truly understand what is going on in the lives of their clients and ensure that their responses are based on fact rather than assumption. A commitment to listening also means that they are continually learning from those with whom they interact.

10.          Practice humility.

Briefings

Our seas need protecting

<p>Unless you fish or dive you&rsquo;re unlikely to have much idea of what life on the seabed looks like. But there&rsquo;s a hidden crisis facing Scotland&rsquo;s marine environment and only those whose lives are inextricably bound up with the sea seem to be aware of it. &nbsp;A community group on Arran were one of the first to wake up to the devastation inflicted on the seabed caused by dredging and bottom trawling. <a href="http://www.arrancoast.com/">COAST&rsquo;s campaign</a> to secure the first ever No Take Zone designation was a milestone and now other coastal communities are starting to organise.</p> <p>25/2/15</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Fauna & Flora International is coordinating an initiative that will provide technical and practical support and best practice guidance to those coastal communities around Scotland who want to conserve their local marine areas. This builds on our existing partnership with the Community of Arran Seabed Trust (COAST), a community based organisation on the isle of Arran off the west coast of Scotland that has been uniquely successful in gaining protection for its local coastal area and has learnt important lessons that could prove invaluable to other communities. Ultimately the project hopes to create a network of communities, allowing them to work together to share their experiences and benefit from a louder voice in the debate around the future of Scotland’s seas.

Watch a short video explain the work to protect Scotland’s marine environment HERE

 

 

Briefings

Support the frontline

<p><span>When working at the grass roots and dealing with a world that seems incessantly top down, there's a constant tension that never quite gets resolved. From this perspective, many community workers take the view that a disproportionate amount of resource is getting sucked into what is often seen as the &lsquo;poverty industry&rsquo;, diverting much needed funding from the coal face. Many believe that frontline services should be the last to be cut rather than being viewed, as they are at present, as low hanging fruit.&nbsp; This voice from the Gorbals gives vent to some of that frustration.</span></p> <p>25/2/15</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Darren McGarvey, Bella Caledonia

This is an edited version of an article from Bella Caledonia

As the low evening sun dips behind the high rise flats of Norfolk Court – tower blocks once pitched as New York style sky scrapers – now waiting to be condemned – a long shadow is cast on the strip of derelict land where her structural sibling, Stirlingfauld Place – now demolished – once stood.  There is something futile about the two remaining towers as they leer, like two middle fingers, in stubborn isolation from the surrounding scenery.  The post-modern buildings growing up around them, with their confident, trend ridden facades, seem perfectly normal by day.  But like everything else in the Gorbals, they take on a new, shifty character depending on which way the dwindling day light hits them.

Gathered neatly on the tarmac in the foreground, a group of around 15 children wait patiently outside a local community centre.  They seem cheerful for a Monday evening. As they rub their hands together, one may assume it’s to ward off the creeping winter chill, but it’s far more likely in anticipation of the imminent arrival of the youth workers who will soon open the doors of The Barn.

“Coming to The Barn geez me peace as it gets me oot the hoose” says Benji, with a precocious self-awareness unbefitting of a working class 12-year-old.

As the doors swing open and young people pour inside, a youth worker smiles before saying:  “They’re at the door all the time.  They come here right after school. But we don’t have the staff to keep the place open.”

Life in the Gorbals is in state of consistent transition.  But unlike other parts of Glasgow, where progress occurs more incrementally – if at all – here on the quiet south bank of the River Clyde, change is far more palpable and dramatic.  Here, regeneration has become a by-word for business and represents a ceaseless and lucrative commercial enterprise over which local people have very little authentic influence.

Like the shrill birds that hover above, scouting the area while shitting from a high height, before flying off with whatever scraps they can find; decision-making in the Gorbals is also a messy business.  And one all too often conducted well over the heads of the people who live here.

In the Gorbals it’s created a fertile bed of resentment from which cynicism and apathy have grown.

Outsiders interpret that anger as self-defeating and futile; insiders DO NOT GIVE A FUCK what outsiders think.

The interior of The Barn is brightly lit and colourfully decorated.  Life affirming slogans adorn the walls.  One reads:  “Don’t aim for success if you want it; just do what you love and believe in, and it will come naturally.”  Situated in the middle on the main hall are brightly coloured couches where teenagers – who recently constituted their own youth committee –  chat while the younger kids dart around between air hockey, table tennis, pool, snooker, baking, football and even a sectioned off computer room for X Box enthusiasts and soon to be social recluses.

In The Barn, local young people of all ages and abilities learn how to play, share and express themselves in a safe and affirming environment where being yourself is more than enough.  But even something as simple and vital as this needs to be paid for.  Which means all this good will and joy needs to be quantified, measured and justified every 12 months or it may become subject to ‘efficiency savings’.

Joe McConnell, the democratically recognised leader (not manager) of The Barn, is unusually frank in his assessment of the various interests operating in the area.  According to him, top-down, micro-managed, target orientated, community economics can lead to potentially life changing work falling out of sync with grassroots needs and aspirations.

He believes the opportunity for meaningful and lasting progress is often hindered – and even undermined – by the very organisations and institutions financed to empower deprived communities.

On the day-to-day hustle of cultivating personal self-esteem and a sense of community spirit in this ever-changing urban expanse, Joe said:  “It can have a profound and positive effect on young people and it is a challenging and hugely rewarding job. But I think we are a long way from this being understood or accepted by a fairly large element of funding bodies and the public sector.”

The third sector – or at least the cross-section of the sector which is regulated – is comprised of over 45,000 voluntary organisations, employing 138,000 people while drawing on the altruism of over 1.3 million unpaid volunteers.  Volunteers I’d be happy to guess, somewhat hazardously, likely reside in the area in where these services are being provided.

In short, the only labour many people have to offer their community is the act of helping other paid managers and employees deliver services.  But, in many cases, volunteers have no real influence over the projects themselves.

Joe and his team are just one of hundreds of groups operating across Glasgow, in extremely challenging circumstances, who attempt to tackle social issues fundamentally by forming meaningful relationships with the young people over a long period of time, before behavioural problems develop.

Glasgow City Council’s budget for the voluntary sector – a public document, buried in torturous managerial speak, details every organisations core budget and the ‘variances’ and ‘efficiency savings’ – cuts to you and me – over the next 3 years.  The Barn, with historical roots in the Gorbals for over 30 years, has received a 30% cut in its budget over the last 6 years.

The total ‘efficiency savings’ made by Glasgow City Council for the next 3 years total just over £1.4 million.  This was achieved by shaving relatively small amounts of funding from relatively small groups, which by definition, find the cuts harder to absorb than larger organisations.

There is very little scrutiny of the sector beyond its own internal evaluations, making it relatively unaccountable to the communities it purports to serve.  The dependency on funding approval leads to a self-censorship where criticism is concerned however, at The Barn they don’t seem afflicted by this structural apathy.

Within the Third Sector, a managerial-consultancy class seems empowers itself merely by talking vaguely in the language of ‘Social Justice’.  The term itself is so subjective and like other common buzz words, such as, Social Capital, illustrate how corporate terminology has slowly permeated almost every aspect of our lives.

A ballooning poverty industry booms on the backs of the poor..

The Third Sector should act as a check and balance to Government oversight, however, the sector is mainly funded with public money.  The sector publishes its own in-house paper which gives a clue as to how they seem themselves from the inside.  There are no ulterior motives or dodgy intentions, simply a structural assumption they know what others need and that only they, in their educated wisdom can deliver it.  Therefore, rocking the boat conflicts with self-interest; leaving vulnerable communities without any authentic representation.

Barry McLaughlin, a 25-year-old youth worker, employed at The Barn until last year, feels improving community self-esteem, and not simply employability, is key to authentic empowerment.

Refreshingly unguarded, Barry said:  “The most important thing for us is the positive relationships you build up with the young people.  If you don’t have trust then nothing can be achieved.”

He continued:

“There’s a sense of apathy due to decisions being made in the Gorbals without consulting the people that live here.  The Gorbals has a negative narrative that says ‘were no good enough’.  We’re trying to change that by saying the Gorbals is an amazing place.  The tools to fix the place are already here rather than parachuting government initiatives in who don’t understand the area.  They want us to do work that looks good and sounds good; but isn’t always good.”

Barry, visibly concerned he may be neglecting the young people, merely by talking to me, said:  “Impact is something we are asked about a lot by funders but it’s difficult to quantify.  You can see it as soon as you walk in the door.”

He sighs, as if resigned to some immovable truth before smiling, hopefully: “In an ideal world we would get funded for building trusting relationships with young people.”

Briefings

Democracy is new zeitgeist

<p>Interest in the extent to which citizens and communities can have their voice heard more clearly within the democratic process has never been greater.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a measure of how quickly this has grown that something being referred to as a Democratic Sector is starting to be emerge &ndash; a loose collection of organisations and individuals interested in building a better democracy.&nbsp; Worth mentioning two upcoming events that reflect this new zeitgeist. Planning Democracy&rsquo;s&nbsp; <em>Planning : The People&rsquo;s Perspective </em>and What Works Scotland&rsquo;s <em>Democratic Sector Day.</em></p> <p><em>25/2/15</em></p>

 

Information about two forthcoming conferences which promote a stronger voice for citizens and communities within the democratic process:

What Works Scotland is delighted to invite you to Democratic Sector Day – an encounter between people working in the public participation sector in Scotland.

Who can participate? Anyone working in the Democratic Sector in Scotland. That is, organisations, networks and practitioners whose job is to foster and/or enable public participation in policy and decision making, and community engagement in public service design and delivery. This may include practitioners from the public, third and private sector.

What is the purpose of the event?

DSD is a day for participation practitioners to share ideas, projects and ambitions, and hopefully develop a better understanding of this ‘community of practice’ in Scotland. The objectives are:

1. Improve our understanding of the Democratic Sector in Scotland: Who is doing what and how?

2. Discover opportunities for collaboration regarding research and practice

What will happen at the event?

The event will be hands-on and interactive:

 In the morning… there are structured table conversations to generate key themes for the rest of the day.

In the afternoon… participants decide what issues matter most to them and work in groups, before reporting back in a closing plenary session.

The design of the event borrows elements from formats such as Open Space, Unconference and Dialogue Circles in order to be as interactive and productive as possible.

Who funds the event?

What Works Scotland

Edinburgh University’s Academy of Government

Attendance is free, please book here

Contact about the organisation of the event: Simon Kershaw simon.Kershaw@ed.ac.uk and about the contents of the event: Oliver Escobar oliver.escobar@ed.ac.uk

Partners collaborating in planning DSD :

Angus Hardie (Scottish Community Alliance), Fiona Savage (FS Associates), Juliet Swann and Willie Sullivan (Electoral Reform Society Scotland), Tim Hughes and Sarah Allan (Involve), Alistair Stoddart (Democratic Society Scotland), Mark Langdon (CLD Standards Council), Susan Pettie (So Say Scotland), Fiona Garven (Scottish Community Development Centre), George Lamb (Disability History Scotland), Irene McAra-McWilliam (Glasgow School of Art), Ian Turner, Doreen Grove, Kathleen Glazik and Katy Betchley (Scottish Government), Bronagh Gallagher (West and Central Voluntary Sector Network + Art of Hosting), Sarah Drummond (Snook).

What Works Scotland is hosting this because…WWS is a 3-year project with the remit of Using evidence to transform public services for all of Scotland’s communities to flourish. Our work is guided by the key principles from the Christie Commission, and a key area is public participation and community engagement. Within this broad area we are planning various collaborative research projects and Knowledge Exchange events. Democratic Sector Day falls within the latter. You can see more info about WWS here: http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk

Invitation to participate in Democratic Sector Day, 10am-4.30pm, 5th March 2015, The South Hall at Pollock Halls, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh EH16 5AY

BOOK NOW: click here 

**********************************************************************************

‘Planning : The People’s Perspective’ a Conference for the Less Heard Voice in Planning

 Planning Democracy campaign for a fairer more inclusive planning system in Scotland. We have designed this conference especially with communities groups and community councillors in mind. In our experience most conferences about planning lack a strong community voice – this conference will be different. Planning Democracy’s management committee includes three community councillors who together have over 70 years’ experience between them. They have advised and helped shape the conference programme to ensure you get the most out of it.

 At the conference you will

– hear three community members speak about their experience of the planning system

– find out about Equal Rights of Appeal and how it can help improve the planning experience for people

– find out how Equal Rights of Appeal operates in Ireland from leading professor, Geraint Ellis from Queen’s University, Belfast

– meet others and exchange experience

– learn from experts on a variety of planning topics, including Public Inquiries and planning law

– work with us to campaign for more inclusive planning

 Cost: £10 community groups and individuals, £20 professionals

For more information see our website, reply to this email or ring 0781 387 4805.

Book your place today. We have a travel fund available to help people who might struggle to pay transport costs.

When: Saturday 25th April 2015, 10 – 4.30pm

Where: Central Glasgow, Trades Hall

Book online today. Click here

Please do share the conference details with others!