Briefings

Communities go for representation

September 7, 2016

<p><span>The fact that candidates for local council elections are either organised along party lines or stand as independent candidates has always seemed like a missed opportunity in terms of connecting local democracy to local communities.&nbsp; There is no rule to prevent communities from putting forward their own candidates and, given how remote and disconnected many communities feel from their local council, it&rsquo;s strange that community candidates aren&rsquo;t more of a feature on the electoral landscape. The recently formed West Dunbartonshire Community Party could be the first of many.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Dunbarton and Vale of Leven Reporter

Councillors Jim Bollan and George Black of West Dunbartonshir Council have joined forces to help create a new political party.

‘West Dunbartonshire Community Party’ aims to have local policies set by local people.

These policies will revolve around local issues or areas that directly affect local communities, such services in The Vale of Leven Hospital, new council homes building projects, Trident transportation throughout West Dunbartonshire and a total ban on fracking.

They aim to make sure decisions are taken more at community level, look at council spending, help attract employment and business to the area, look at the River Leven and the Clyde in both an environmental and commercial way and hope to introduce greater democracy into West Dunbartonshire Council.

The party is made up from a wide range of different political backgrounds, some who have not been in a political party for decades and some who pride themselves on being community activists. They are also joined by Jim Bollan and George Black.

Jim had decided to retire next May and George has been independent for several years, but Jim has decided to stand again for his Leven ward and in election for West Dunbartonshire’s community Party in 2017. George has decided to leave his independent status and stand for election in his Dumbarton ward for the new party.

George Black said: “This area needs political direction that is based on the needs of the people not on party political expediency. We need to concentrate on providing local services for local people.

“We have to return to democratic decision making and a first step in this process is to increase the frequency of council meetings to be held in public. We also need to insist on a guaranteed future for our local Vale of Leven Hospital for example. Support us, we are here to serve you.”

Jim said: “The formation of this local party by local people was the main reason I have decided not to retire at the next election but stand again for re-election under the WDCP banner which will concentrate on local issues being raised by communities across West Dunbartonshire.”

WDCP is hoping to attract like-minded people to come forward and represent their communities in the council elections in May 2017.

Briefings

Human rights at risk

<p>The UK doesn&rsquo;t have a constitution but if we did, it would be in crisis.&nbsp; Last week our new Prime Minister confirmed that there will be no backsliding on the business of Brexit and so that forces the Scottish (and Irish) question to be answered one way or another. In the same week, Justice Secretary Liz Truss confirmed that the Government is going to press ahead with scrapping the Human Rights Act. Except for the fact that it&rsquo;s enshrined in the 1998 Scotland Act. It&rsquo;s going to get messy. Civil rights group, Liberty, are campaigning hard to Save Our Human Rights Act.&nbsp;</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Larry Holmes, Liberty

Why is Save Our Human Rights Act important?

Our Human Rights Act protects every one of us: young and old; wealthy and poor; you and your neighbour.

Our HRA has already achieved so much.  It’s held the State to account for spying on us; safeguarded our soldiers; and supported peaceful protest.  It’s helped rape victims; defended domestic violence sufferers; and guarded against slavery.  It’s protected those in care; shielded press freedom; and provided answers for grieving families.

Its protections are the most fundamental – those we should all enjoy, because we’re human.

Think about it.  Which of them would you go without?  The right to life?  The right not to be tortured?  The right to a fair trial?

Would you really be happy if these basic freedoms weren’t properly protected?

Because that’s the threat we now face.

The Government wants to scrap our Human Rights Act, and replace it with their “British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities”.

This would weaken the rights of everyone, meaning less protection against powerful interests.  It would also limit human rights to only those cases the Government considers “most serious”.

Can we really trust political elites to decide when our freedoms should apply?

It’s our Human Rights Act. Don’t let them take it away.

Our short ‘My HRA’ films show just how important the Human Rights Act is – for all of us. And this year we have seen the families of both the Hillsborough 96 and Cheryl James finally find some kind of justice for their loved ones. Without our HRA, that would not have been possible.

The Government must stop pouring energy, and yet more public money, into scrapping these hard-won rights and protections. In the current climate, we need them now more than ever.

Liberty won’t give up the fight

Liberty is still working behind the scenes doing everything we can to Save Our HRA.

You can support our work by joining us, and standing together with thousands of other Liberty members fighting to protect our rights and civil liberties.

With thanks for everything you do,

Larry

Larry Holmes

Head of Campaigns

 

 

 

Briefings

Banking for the Common Good

<p>Considering the devastation that the banks have inflicted upon the economy and the country as a whole, it&rsquo;s remarkable how little reform has been imposed on the industry. With some minimal adjustments to the most reckless of internal practices,&nbsp; and eye watering losses continuing to be shovelled onto the taxpayer, it&rsquo;s been more or less business as usual ever since. So a new report from NEF, Common Weal and others into the future of banking is a welcome relief.&nbsp; Banking for the Common Good advocates an entirely new direction for Scottish banks.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Bella Caledonia

Banking’s corrupt and unassailable and there’s nothing we can do about it, right? On the day that its revealed the Cabinet minister Sajid David was among Deutsche bankers paid massive bonuses under a tax avoidance scam a new Scottish alternative for a sane banking system has been put forward.

Scotland’s banking system is “unsafe and unfit for purpose” and new “safe, sustainable, stakeholder” banks are needed, linked together through a government-owned network, a new report published today has argued. Robin McAlpine of the Common Weal added: “People think that banking is one of those issue where Scotland just has to sit around and hope that Westminster does something good – which it never does. We really want to get across the message that Scotland could create a really powerful, people-centred banking system within the powers it already has and that this could be a really big, really transformative project for a Scottish Government.”

Christine Berry, Senior Researcher at the New Economics Foundation reiterated the point:

“Despite the dangerous complacency guiding a return to business as usual in the City, we are nowhere near having fixed the problems with our banking system that led to the crisis of 2008. We’re still far too dependent on a small number of very large, very similar shareholder-owned banks with little interest in serving small businesses or rural communities, or in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Scotland doesn’t have to wait for Westminster to wake up to this: this report shows it has the power to lead the way in building a better system, learning from the best of our European neighbours.”

The report, ‘Banking for the Common Good’, comes as the danger of a new financial crisis has been heightened in recent months, with government-owned RBS – Scotland’s biggest bank – telling investors to “sell everything”, as its shares slumped to their lowest value in more than three years. The report is a collaboration between Friends of the Earth Scotland, the New Economics Foundation, the Common Weal and Move Your Money. It essentially shows with a stark clarity that Scotland’s banking sector is made up of a very small number of mega-banks that are failing in terms of services to customers and companies, and of investment in a sustainable and productive economy.

The authors put forward three key proposals that the Scottish Government could enact now, including:

·         a powerful Scottish National Investment Bank

·         locally-rooted ‘People’s Banks’

·         a publicly-owned interbank payment system

The report, authored by Gemma Bone, argues that the new banks could make the Scottish economy more resilient in the face of a future financial crisis by increasing “counter-cyclical spending”, as well as directing funding to “environmentally and socially useful projects”. The proposals draw on best practice internationally including the German ‘Sparkassen’ model and the Nordic Investment Bank. Gemma Bone said:

“The UK missed a big opportunity to reform the banking system after the crisis of 2008, and banking reform has since dropped off the agenda. We wrote this report to show that systemic reform of banking is both possible and desirable.

“It is pleasing to launch it in Edinburgh, a city with a long and varied history of financial innovation but this year we are calling on Scotland to take up a leading role once again to transform the banking system to better meet the pressing needs of the environment, businesses and society.“

Lesley Brennan,Labour MSP for North East of Scotland who is hosting the report launch at the Scottish Parliament this evening commented:

“Since the financial crises of 2008, taxpayers and consumers have been effectively paying the price for the breakdown of an unsustainable model of banking seen here in Scotland and across the world. Simply returning to yet another unsustainable top-heavy model with ‘light touch regulation’ cannot be an option going forward.”

Briefings

A broad alliance

<p>Whenever fracking hits the headlines, the Scottish Government never seems quite able to allay the concerns of those most likely to be affected. The statement usually goes along the lines of &lsquo;there will be no fracking&hellip;..unless it can be proven beyond doubt that there is no risk to health, communities or the environment.&rsquo; And that leaves just a nagging doubt that there might be enough wiggle room for the powerful fracking lobby to make its case.&nbsp; It was that uncertainty that led several communities to establish the Broad Alliance.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Broad Alliance

Website of Broad Alliance

Who are we?

Welcome to the Broad Alliance, a coalition of Scottish communities opposed to onshore and near-shore unconventional oil and gas development (BA), supported by range of NGOs, environmental groups, Trades Unions, Public Health experts, and political groups.

BA communities will each have their own specific concerns and spheres of activity, but there is also a significant shared agenda. Member groups have therefore agreed a Protocol to clarify what is shared by all, and to offer guidance about how groups can act on behalf of the wider Alliance.

 

 

Background:

The Alliance has been in existence since 2014, and has lobbied Scottish Government to ban unconventional gas and oil extraction. Individual groups have experience of Local Public Inquiry, and of local Planning Appeals processes, and there is already significant pooling and sharing of knowledge & resources. 

 

However, following the announcement of a temporary moratorium on 28th January 2015, when a programme of further reviews was announced by Scottish Government, no timetable has been announced, and developers continue to vigorously promote the activity. The Broad Alliance has therefore agreed protocols and a Steering Group structure, and is working to develop a consistent and pro-active strategic response. Steering group also committed, at their first meeting (March 2014) to arranging quarterly meeting of all members, and arrangements are in hand for an initial meeting (TBD in coming weeks)

Briefings

Urban rural split.

<p>As a general rule of thumb, the more remote a community is, the greater the need for self-sufficiency. And so some of the more remote rural communities must have been wondering what all the fuss was when, during the last big cold spell of weather, some of the city councils were getting it in the neck from residents for not gritting pavements in residential areas right up to their front doors. The communities of Kirkconnel and Kellohom in Dumfries and Galloway are clearly made of sterner stuff.</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Stephen Temlett, Daily Record

Windfarm cash has helped buy a new community tractor for Upper Nithsdale.

The Kirkconnel and Kelloholm Development Trust was awarded £32,000 from the SSE Sustainable Development Fund towards the cost of the vehicle.

And four volunteers from the community have been trained to operate the machine which will be used to cut grass in summer and clear or grit roads in the winter months.

Councillor John Syme said: “Two of the issues we had was getting the grass cut up here and roads cleared in the winter.

“The development trust came up with the idea for a community tractor that people can use and it will be needed a lot up here.

“A lot of areas are difficult to get to especially in the winter for gritting the roads. We’re looking to use this tractor quite a bit to help clear up the roads and help with winter maintenance which is vital up here.

“The council has just finished putting four folk through the training and now we want to show the community that it’s up and running.

 

“I’d like to thank the volunteers who gave up their time to be trained on it, everyone who helped secure the funding and the council for facilitating the training for the drivers.”

Briefings

Parishes from the past

<p>From 1790, statistical records were kept on a parish by parish basis of what was happening within Scotland&rsquo;s communities. Records were maintained by the local minister or sometimes the local laird. These records have long since been subsumed into the national archives but the faint outline of parish boundaries may still linger within the cultural and folk memory of these communities. A new initiative from TRACS aims to help communities to map and even reclaim their cultural assets.&nbsp;</p> <p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: TRACS

The People’s Parish is a new initiative from TRACS (Traditional Arts and Culture Scotland) which aims to support communities explore, shape and creatively use their local assets – stories, traditions and history – to showcase themselves to the world and build a picture of Scotland in the first part of the 21st century from the people’s point of view.

The People’s Parish will explore new ways of mapping communities by gathering and giving voice, resulting in a platform of songs, stories, dances, traditions and histories that best reflect each community.

We invite local activists, artists and community organisations to a day to explore how the initiative could work in the fifteen parishes of Midlothian on Saturday 10th September at theNational Mining Museum, Newtongrange.

The day will be a mix of speakers, hands-on activity with maps, plus local song and story fromKirsty Law and Lea Taylor.

Booking for the day is via the Scottish Storytelling Centre (0131 556 9579) or online here.

 

The modest cover charge of £18 (£15 for members of the Storytelling, Danceand Music Forums) includes lunch.

Briefings

Learn from each other

August 24, 2016

<p class="MsoNormal">Everyone learns differently and the science of learning suggests that there are up to seven different learning styles &ndash; each using a different part of the brain &ndash; and that we may use different styles of learning at different times for different reasons. The Community Learning Exchange doesn&rsquo;t claim to be an expert on any of that but what it does is to offer your local group the chance to visit another community that&rsquo;s doing something that interests you. You never know, you may even learn something.&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Community Learning Exchange

The Community Learning Exchange is now into its second year of funding.  Ninety-eight learning visits have been supported, with 145 organisations benefiting. A taste of what has been happening is below.

When Renfrew Development Trust visited  Creetown Initiative in June it benefited from Creetown’s experience in working with funders, both local and national; learnt how to achieve a mix of revenue streams; and discussed how to transform local needs into enterprise and employment  opportunities.   “It was useful to see some of the things that we have talked about in reality – people being employed, physical improvements such as playparks, landmarks and landscaping improved, and to see a building project substantially completed. Also to see the range and diversity of projects being tackled was a huge benefit.”

Early in 2016 Kirkhill & Bunchrew Community Trust visited the Embo Trust community shop.  The purpose of the visit was to find out more about appropriate business and funding models; explore ideas about turning the shop into a community hub; and see how Embo approached the operational and financial issues of retail management.  Kirkhill & Bunchrew Community Trust felt that by learning from another community’s experience it was less likely that it would “re-invent the wheel”.

Representatives from seven Moray Social Enterprises visited ten organisations during a learning visit to Shetland in May 2016. The visit was organised by tsiMORAY.  The key organisation that was chosen to host was Cope Ltd, Shetland because they are seen as an inspirational example of inclusiveness and employability in action as well as a sustainable, growing and thriving social enterprise.

The visit provided inspiration, new connections, fresh ideas, new learning and the opportunity to make lasting friendships between those attending the visit and their peers in Shetland.

Four members of the Pairc Trust visited five trusts (Galson, Carloway, Barvas, North Harris and West Harris) during April-June 2016, with the aim of learning good practice about consulting with communities, keeping administrative records as landlords of crofting casework and to learn about developing renewable energy projects.  Pairc Trust now works more closely with other similar organisations throughout the Western Isles. . The trust  realised how important it is to have a Facebook page to keep members of the  community informed and updated. “We introduced this after our initial visits and we have had a lot of local people contribute and get in touch. The visits were extremely useful. They gave us an invaluable opportunity to meet people in similar positions and we hope to work with them in partnership in future projects.”

 

To find out how your community based organisation can apply, contact one of the SCA member networks (check www.scottishcommunityalliance.org.uk ) or email exchange@scottishcommunityalliance.org.uk or call the Exchange Coordinators (Jane on 07581 216246 or Amanda on 07843 481790).

Briefings

Dare To Dream

<p class="MsoNormal">Every community has a story to tell about itself. Some are told and retold countless times and come to define how a place is known. Other stories are never told and lurk, hidden away in the community&rsquo;s collective subconscious. How we imagine our community plays an important part in shaping the places they become in the future. And that&rsquo;s why the #DareToDream project which runs over the next couple of months is so important. Make sure you take the opportunity to tell your story or begin to imagine a better future for your community.</p>

 

Author: TRACS

#DareToDream is an outreach initiative that book-ends and runs alongside the Scottish International Storytelling Festival (a ten day festival running from Fri 21 – Mon 31 Oct). Inspired by Scotland’s Year of Innovation, Architecture and Design 2016, we invite schools and communities across Scotland to take part in a collective act of dreaming, storytelling and imagination.

From 1st September to 31st November 2016, storytellers, artists, community groups, schools, libraries and social, cultural and environmental organisations are all invited to host local events encouraging people to discover the stories of their local place and to dream up possibilities for our shared future. Create your own story, invite a local storyteller to visit your school or group, build an Imagination Station in your classroom, library or café, or host a story circle in your living room!

A social media campaign will run for the duration of the international festival in October, with a #DareToDream Day on Thu 27 Oct. On this day, every creative citizen in Scotland is invited to share a dream for the future online – on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. Our aim is to make Scotland’s collective imagination visible for the world to see!

Campaign Theme and Resources

Every place, every community, every person has a story to tell. Storytelling helps us connect – to each other, to our past, to our place, to our world – and together we are empowered by our connections. In this sense, our campaign reaches for some big themes: creative placemaking, active citizenship, heritage, sustainability, health and recovery, community change and transformation.

We have worked with the Scottish Recovery Network, the International Futures Forum, the US Department of Arts & Culture, Voluntary Arts Scotland and the Scottish Storytelling Forum to create our campaign resources. This includes a freely downloadable #DareToDream Toolkit for schools and communities.

Take Part!

All local groups can register participation and download the #DareToDream Toolkit by visiting the campaign website www.daretodream.scot. All local events will be made visible on our #DareToDream map. All resources will be available to download before the end of August.

•          Register here 

•          Download #DareToDream Toolkit

•          Invitation to All Schools (& Schools Registration)

•          Join the #DareToDream Facebook Event

Press release, posters and a logo can be downloaded on the press section of our campaign website 

http://www.daretodream.scot/press

A huge Thank You to our #DareToDream Friends who are sharing this information with their networks and encouraging people to take part!

When:  Local events happening between September to November inclusive

Social Media Campaign: Fri 21 Oct – Fri 28 Oct

Focal point: #DareToDream Day, Thu 27 Oct

Where: Various locations across Scotland. Map of all groups can be found at http://www.daretodream.scot/map

What:   Local groups and individuals across Scotland will be taking part in storytelling, story sharing and storymaking activities. Storytellers, teachers and community leaders will engage people in dreaming and envisioning the world they hope to inhabit and – looking back from the future – tell the stories of how they got there. The resulting ideas, images, videos and more will be uploaded to an online platform, yielding a crowd-sourced collective dream for the future, inspiring local creativity and community action.

This is a contribution to Scotland’s Year of Innovation, Architecture and Design 2016 #IAD2016

Briefings

Subversion of democracy

<p class="MsoNormal">In the midst of the MP&rsquo;s expenses scandal, David Cameron made a comment to the effect that any sense of outrage we felt about expenses would pale into insignificance alongside the scandal-still-to-emerge about lobbying and how influence was being bought and sold. But since then we&rsquo;ve heard virtually nothing - other than the tawdry spectacle of a couple of MPs being caught on camera selling access to power. George Monbiot lifts the lid on some of the tactics that powerful vested interests are now employing to get their way.</p>

 

Author: George Monbiot, The Guardian

This is how, in a democracy, you win when you’re outnumbered: you purchase the results. It’s how politics now works: the very rich throw money at the parties, lobby groups and think tanks that project their demands. If they are clever, they keep their names out of it.

Here’s an example: a campaign fronted by the former England cricket captain Sir Ian Botham, called You Forgot the Birds. It appears to have two purposes: to bring down the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and to get the natural history presenter Chris Packham sacked from the BBC.

This is what it claims to be: “a network of people who are passionate about bird habitat. Some of us are conservationists or self-confessed birders, some are farmers and landowners, some work full-time in the countryside while others are volunteers from the cities.” And this is what was revealed by a footnote at the bottom of one of its press releases, that has since vanished from the web: “The You Forgot The Birds Campaign is funded by the British grouse industry.” Ah, the grouse industry. Who would have guessed?

To shoot grouse you have to be exceedingly rich: it can cost around £7000 per person per day. The owners of grouse moors, who are also exceedingly rich, justify these fees by ensuring that there are vast numbers of birds to shoot. This requires, across great tracts of our uplands, the elimination of almost everything else.

Grouse are wild birds, but cosseted at the expense of other lifeforms. Predators and competitors must be eliminated, either legally or, in the case of protected species such as peregrine falcons, golden eagles, red kites and hen harriers, illegally. Many grouse moors are black holes for birds of prey. They disappear and their satellite tags stop working in the same places, again and again. Alien abduction? Russian black ops? No: shooting, trapping and poisoning by the gamekeepers employed to maximise grouse numbers, most of whom, on these remote moors, get away with it.

Producing as many grouse as possible also means burning and draining the land, to create a monoculture of the young heather the birds eat. Sure, this releases the carbon in the soil,pollutes rivers and helps to flood the towns downstream. But to hell with the plebs.

To rub our noses in it properly, we pay them for the privilege: grouse moors are subsidised by us. At the height of his austerity programme, as essential public services were cut to the bone, David Cameron’s government raised the subsidy for grouse moors by 84%, to £56 per hectare. Some owners now harvest hundreds of thousands of pounds of our money every year.

Cameron also tried to close the police wildife crime unit, which would have pleased his friends no end. It was saved only by a public outcry. Conservationists have called for a law of vicarious liability, making the owners of grouse moors responsible for the wildlife crime they commission, rather than leaving only the gamekeepers to take the rap. But this proposal was struck down by Cameron’s environment minister, Richard Benyon. I’m sure it had nothing to do with the fact that he owns a grouse moor.

But through the efforts of wildlife campaigners (like Chris Packham and the RSPB) and people whose homes have been flooded downstream, the grouse industry is now being called to account. Last week, the petition posted by the conservationist Mark Avery, calling for an end to driven grouse shooting, passed the 100,000-signature threshold: the issue is now likely to be debated in parliament.

The result is You Forgot the Birds, championed by the Daily Mail, which describes it as “a grassroots campaign by farmers and conservationists”. It is of course coincidental that Paul Dacre, the Mail’s editor, owns a grouse moor.

We know who’s in front of this “grassroots campaign”: Sir Ian Botham, who runs a shoot in North Yorkshire. But who’s behind it? Only one funder has so far been identified: the billionaire hedge fund owner Crispin Odey. We also know that the campaign is run by a lobbying company called Abzed. It boasts that “a besieged grouse moor community turned to Abzed. Our approach was to turn the spotlight onto the RSPB”. Very grassroots, I’m sure.

The claims the campaign makes keep falling apart. Last year the Telegraph had to issue a humiliating correction and apology to the RSPB after it repeated statements in a You Forgot the Birds press release that seem to have been conjured out of thin air. Last week, in the Mailand on the Today programme, Ian Botham recited figures for the rare birds found on grouse moors during a survey by the British Trust for Ornithology. The BTO says it has conducted no such survey.

The purpose of the countryside, for people like Botham, Odey and Dacre, is an exclusive playground for the rich. Authentic country people are those who own or rent significant tracts of land, many of whom live in cities, and those who work for them, as long as they wear tweed instead of Gore-Tex. As for the RSPB and its members, they’re bipedal vermin. Never mind that many of them live and work in the countryside; they are interlopers with no right to a voice in rural life.

The media collaborates. News reporters describe shooting and hunting lobbyists as “countryside groups”, anointing them as the authentic rural voice and casting those who oppose them – who often seem to possess a far greater love for and knowledge of the countryside – as interfering townies. Documentary makers seek a stereotyped rusticity which, though politically charged, is presented as the neutral and immutable spirit of rural life. The co-presenter of the series Clarissa and the Countryman was Sir Johnny Scott, a baronet who owns 5,000 acres in the Scottish borders: that’s what the BBC means by countryman. Where is he now? Ah yes, fronting up You Forgot the Birds with Sir Ian Botham.

When opposition is seen as illegitimate, it’s legitimate to cheat and bludgeon. That’s how the lords of the land have long maintained their pre-eminence. Today you can no longer call out the yeomanry, sit in judgement then have dissenters hanged. But there are other means of bypassing democracy. You buy yourself a crowd, or at least an outfit that looks like a crowd. You demand, from your position of comfortable anonymity, the silencing of people who contest your claims, like Chris Packham. You use a corrupt and partisan media to hound them.

This is how politics works these days: astroturf groups (fake grassroots movements) and undisclosed interests are everywhere. The same forces are at play in the tobacco industry, fossil fuels, junk food, banking, guns, private health provision, in fact throughout public life. They recruit celebrities to front their campaigns. They confuse and obfuscate, make up stories and grant their anonymous backers plausible deniability.

They are a threat to democracy. Call them out, expose them to the light, and don’t believe a word they say.

www.monbiot.com

Briefings

Singing from the same hymn sheet

<p class="MsoNormal">The top job in the civil service must offer up certain insights into the workings of government that are denied to the rest of us. We now have two former Permanent Secretaries -Sir John Elvidge and Sir Peter Housden &ndash; independently coming to the same conclusion and publishing their thoughts on how far the State has to shift if public services are ever going to be fit for purpose. Both reports are worth a read but it makes you wonder why they didn&rsquo;t push for these changes when they could.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

 

Author: Sir Peter Housden

Sir Peter Housden’s paper Rethinking Public Services is published by the Centre for Public Impact.

As the Labour leadership contenders debate the role of private providers in the NHS, and the new education secretary reflects on the forced march to academy status, people working in public services will again be wondering which planet they are on.

At a time when resources are so constrained and demand is rising, why does the state rely on crude forms of performance management, take a gladiatorial stance toward anyone dealing in evidence, and preside over systems exhausted by policy churn and structural change?

The reality is of course more complex. Practitioners on the ground have often used their autonomy to work with service users and communities to understand their needs and pool their resources. But the perceived reality remains of two tribes at war.

I came out of a career in government and public services certain that we could do better. Adrian Brown at the Centre for Public Impact was similarly puzzled at how stuck governments had become in their devotion to systems of improvement whose time had passed.

But what would the world look like if our approach to public services improvement began at the grassroots?

Think of a child learning to read, a care worker engaging with a house-bound couple, or a physician discussing treatment with a patient. This is co-production. The abiding purpose is to enable people to be in control of their own lives. Practitioner and citizen bring their knowledge, creativity and resilience to bear on the issue at hand.

In their hearts, ministers and officials knows this is where the solutions lie. They engage with this form of practice and are inspired by it. But there is cognitive dissonance at work as their intelligence is ground under the wheels of government and recycled into a narrative of a never-ending struggle against inertia in the self-serving public sector.

If we look outward from the co-creation of value, a new set of imperatives emerges. Government focuses its efforts on nurturing the fundamental relationship between the citizen and practitioner. The attrition of energy and morale in the workforce becomes a prime issue, rather than collateral damage accepted in the pursuit of structural change.

But the nature of the practical, empowering and collaborative leadership required at ground level is absolutely at odds with the iconoclasts that governments have preferred to honour. Performance management and accountability is constructed in partnership on a platform of common endeavour. New forms of political narrative and practice are adopted to replace the sword-in-hand model adopted by successive ministers (some of whom then complain about the scars on their back).

None of this requires a sacrifice of rigour or rowing back on commitments to social mobility or mealy-mouthed consensus. It is a hard-edged partnership for improvement, building on what really works. The knowledge and commitment is out there. The challenge for government is to grasp it.

Sir Peter Housden’s paper Rethinking Public Services is published by the Centre for Public Impact.

Sir John Elvidge’s paper The Enabling State is published by Carnegie UK